I think that Everyman is now happy and ready to face the reckoning after he put on the garment of contrition.
He is happy that Good deeds is able to accompany him. With Good deeds as his companion and wearing true contrition, Everyman will be made worthy of his eternal glory.
The answer to the question above is "C) Precedent" which is the kind of reasoning that Justice Fortas uses to support his argument when he refers to Keyishian v Board of Regents in the majority opinion for Tinker v Des Moines<span>. The precedent is the kind of reasoning which a person uses by using legal aspect support. Abe Fortas is a man with a law background. Thus, precedent is the most likely kind of reasoning he uses.</span>
The author supports the claim that ordinary and digital mail are very different <span>by sharing a hypothetical story as an example of the subject. The simple invitation and the specific time and place where it is supposed to be held are simple details that can be intercepted with digital mail compared to an ordinary mail that's slow and takes a lot of time and energy to be delivered to the receiver.</span>
Past progressive is the correct answer.
Answer:
I would say coffee...?
Explanation:
Elizabeth has a longer name, just as Gorge, Helen, and Steve, while Bert, Karen, and Dave have shorter names...? That's about my only explanation.
Hope this helps :) (in some way)
