A scientist is using relative dating to determine the age of a fossil that she discovered. What would allow her to draw the best
conclusions about fossils that are younger than the one she discovered? measuring the amount of carbon and nitrogen in the surrounding rock measuring the amount of potassium and argon in the surrounding rock finding fossils in the same area that are in layers deeper under the surface finding fossils in the same area that are in layers closer to the surface
: D.finding fossils in the same area that are in layers closer to the surface.
Relative dating refers to the age estimation method in which past events are determined, to compare the age of object, organism, strata or rock with the age of other similar entity. This method gives an approximate or estimated age, it does not provide absolute age.
The older fossils are found in deeper layers of the strata as compared to younger fossils. This represents the geological time and life span of primitive or preexisting organisms. Therefore, according to the given situation, finding fossils in the same area that are in layers closer to the surface is the best conclusion
A single test won't put the definitive diagnosis of diabetes. This diagnosis is put on 3 conseccutive measurements and they all have to be more that 125.
