Answer:
That sounds like the old Keynesian idea made popular during Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal: Cut taxes and increase government spending to “prime the pump” during a recession; raise taxes and reduce spending to slow down an “overheated” economy. Keynesianism seemed to have been finally laid to rest in the 1980s when President Ronald Reagan argued for a tax cut on supply‐side grounds, and even liberal economists now agree that such fine‐tuning has little effect on the economy.
Explanation:
1. In a free country, money belongs to the people who earn it. The most fundamental reason to cut taxes is an understanding that wealth doesn’t just happen, it has to be produced. And those who produce it have a right to keep it. We may agree to give up a portion of the wealth we create in order to pay for such public goods as national defense and a system of justice. But we don’t give the government an unlimited claim on our money to use as it sees fit.
Just reread the text I'm sure you can find it in there. You are probably over thinking it. I know this isn't the awnsr you wanted bit you should do a bother activity to clear your mind and try again later☺
D because that was to happen to every person unlike the others
<span>Seleccionar un problema de investigación. Formulación de hipótesis. Variables de interés. Seleccionar niveles de una variable independiente. Seleccionar una variable dependiente .... dos o más teorías. El interés del investigador puede no tener nada que ver con la solución de un problema psicológico o sociológico existente. Como se discutió en el anterior</span>
The native Americans were relocated and given reservations where they could settle.
