1. Identical twins are more likely to have roughly equal intelligence levels than fraternal twins.
2. "<span>Overall, the test scores of the identical twins were much closer together than those of the pairs of fraternal twins."
</span><span>"Ten pairs were identical twins, both developing from the same egg in their mother. The other ten pairs were fraternal twins."
The paragraphs compare the two, but show that it builds to that conclusion by showing those details. These seem like opening paragraphs too, so the final sentence would be the thesis statement. The thesis statement normally tells the reader the author's claim, so those two quotes I pointed out are its supporting details.</span>
the best i can say is The Affordable Care Act, hope this helps u. :)
The correct answer is A. Earth
Explanation:
A root word is a word by itself which can be combined with suffixes and prefixes to create new words, thus root words cannot be shortened but by adding other words or letter before or after them new words are created by mixing the meaning of the root word and the word, syllable or letter added. The words geology, georgic and geode have a common root word which is geo and which is combined with different suffixes such as -logy, -ergic and -de to create new words. The root word geo derives from Greek and means earth, ground or land, as mentioned before the root word is combined with suffixes to create new meanings in this way -logy means the science or study of something which means geology is the study of earth or land; -ergic means produce by, which means georgic is a poem produced or inspired by land (agriculture ) and the suffix -ede means separation which is links to geode definition which is a formation of rocks. Thus, the root word geology, georgic, and geode share is "geo" which means Earth.
Answer: agent-relativity
Explanation: While there are several deolontogical theories, the agent-relative theory allows agents to give precedence to their own status, interests, and special relationships. Alhough every moral theory gives us the same aim of acting morally, there are those that gives us different substantive aims. The agent‐relative theory is one of these—as a moral theory it doesn't give every
agent the exact same set of substantive aims. In this it holds that an act is permissible if and only if it maximizes the agent’s utility.
B- surrender is the opposite
Hope this helps :)
