1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
erik [133]
3 years ago
10

Does the temperature 0 degrees mean the same thing on both scales

Social Studies
2 answers:
Serjik [45]3 years ago
5 0
Yes ,i believe.
0 is in the middle and it's the middle temperature. 
Schach [20]3 years ago
3 0
No. In Celsius 0 degrees is roughly 32 degrees Fahrenheit (the two scales I assume you are using).
You might be interested in
This is from the Declaration of Independence...Its not a point grab, please dont give me a link. Just what does this mean in mod
Semenov [28]

Answer:

It asserts that Americans as a whole (and not as members of their respective colonies) are a distinct “people.” To “dissolve the political bands” revokes the “social compact” that existed between the Americans and the rest of “the People” of the British commonwealth, reinstates the “state of nature” between Americans and the government of Great Britain, and makes “the Laws of Nature” the standard by which this dissolution and whatever government is to follow are judged. “Declare the causes” indicates they are publicly stating the reasons and justifying their actions rather than acting as thieves in the night. The Declaration is like the indictment of a criminal that states the basis of his criminality. But the ultimate judge of the rightness of their cause will be God, which is why the revolutionaries spoke of an “appeal to heaven”—an expression commonly found on revolutionary banners and flags. As British political theorist John Locke wrote: “The people have no other remedy in this, as in all other cases where they have no judge on earth, but to appeal to heaven.” The reference to a “decent respect to the opinions of mankind” might be viewed as a kind of an international public opinion test. Or perhaps the emphasis is on the word “respect,” recognizing the obligation to provide the rest of the world with an explanation they can evaluate for themselves.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following describes a major consequence of the 1906 Atlanta riot? *
Aliun [14]

Answer:

Major industries fled the city for other regions.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
what is one non-monetary positive incentive for becoming an entrepreneur A. working long hours B. earnig a profit C. being your
nirvana33 [79]
Your answer is C, hope this helps.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
the use of canines for research is restricted by ethics committees in many countries, and social acceptance is declining.
joja [24]

Answer:

Yes, it is becoming an unethical practice.

Explanation:

Animal research has had a vital role in many scientific and medical advances of the past century and continues to aid our understanding of various diseases. Throughout the world, people enjoy a better quality of life because of these advances, and the subsequent development of new medicines and treatments—all made possible by animal research. However, the use of animals in scientific and medical research has been a subject of heated debate for many years in the UK. Opponents to any kind of animal research—including both animal-rights extremists and anti-vivisectionist groups—believe that animal experimentation is cruel and unnecessary, regardless of its purpose or benefit. There is no middle ground for these groups; they want the immediate and total abolition of all animal research. If they succeed, it would have enormous and severe consequences for scientific research.

No responsible scientist wants to use animals or cause them unnecessary suffering if it can be avoided, and therefore scientists accept controls on the use of animals in research. More generally, the bioscience community accepts that animals should be used for research only within an ethical framework.

The UK has gone further than any other country to write such an ethical framework into law by implementing the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986. It exceeds the requirements in the European Union's Directive 86/609/EEC on the protection of animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes, which is now undergoing revision (Matthiessen et al, 2003). The Act requires that proposals for research involving the use of animals must be fully assessed in terms of any harm to the animals. This involves a detailed examination of the particular procedures and experiments, and the numbers and types of animals use. These are then weighed against the potential benefits of the project. This cost-benefit analysis is almost unique to UK animal research legislation; only German law has a similar requirement.

The UK has gone further than any other country to write such an ethical framework into law by implementing the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986

In addition, the UK government introduced 1998 further ‘local' controls—that is, an Ethical Review Process at research institutions—which promote good animal welfare and humane science by ensuring that the use of animals at the designated establishment is justified. The aims of this additional review process are: to provide independent ethical advice, particularly with respect to applications for project licenses, and standards of animal care and welfare; to provide support to licensees regarding animal welfare and ethical issues; and to promote ethical analysis to increase awareness of animal welfare issues and to develop initiatives for the widest possible application of the 3Rs—replacement, reduction, and refinement of the use of animals in research (Russell & Burch, 1959). In practice, there has been concern that the Ethical Review Process adds a level of bureaucracy that is not in proportion to its contribution to improving animal welfare or furthering the 3Rs.

Animal-rights groups also disagree with the 3Rs, since these principles still allow for the use of animals in research; they are only interested in replacement

Although animals cannot yet be completely replaced, it is important that researchers maximize refinement and reduction

3 0
1 year ago
How was life different for African Americans after the Civil War compared to life before the war?
oksano4ka [1.4K]

Answer: After the civil war African Americans were free from their owners

Explanation:During the period of reconstruction, some 2000 African Americans held government jobs.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of these choices is NOT a cultural influence on our wellness?
    9·2 answers
  • What could a boy do if they did not want to be what there father’s were in sheng and chou times
    10·1 answer
  • Your 70-year-old father recently mentioned to you that he no longer enjoys driving at night because of glare from the headlights
    5·1 answer
  • In 1453 the English and the French fought for the last time at the Battle of _______. The French annihilated a charge of English
    9·1 answer
  • Dianne feels overwhelmed. She helps her adult daughter regularly with finances and caring for her grandchildren. She is also the
    9·1 answer
  • What impact would stricter car emission standards in the United States most likely have on other countries?
    9·1 answer
  • How Nepal is a multi geographical country
    11·1 answer
  • The emotional experience that occurs when our beliefs, feelings, and behavior are inconsistent with each other is called: cognit
    14·1 answer
  • The lane you drive in should be:
    7·1 answer
  • The primary thrust of the original intent and wording of the tenth amendment is that:________
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!