Answer:
The cult of personality around Hirohito made the Japanese people, including the military, agree with everything Hirohito did, including his war efforts.
Explanation:
In his own way, Hirohito was equivalent to Hitler in Nazi Germany, or Mussolini in Fascist Italy: they built a cult of personality around their figure, concentrated political and military power, and in that way, gained support from the vast majority of their country's population, to advance the war.
The Japanese case is particular because the Japanese were extremely nationalist, and the Japanese soldiers were not willing to surrend even in the most difficult situations, because they wanted to protect the honor of Japan, represented by the honor of the Emperor Hirohito.
Answer: German machine guns
Explanation:
German machine guns were the most effective defensive weapon during the Battle of Passchendaele, working in tandem with bunkers, barbed wire, and positions higher than the attackers'.
Answer:
*Civilization really hasn't changed over the years that much because us humans still break our backs to get to the goal that we would like to accomplish. But there has been maybe a few bit of some changes, we have technology now, we can do a bit more things that we couldn't have done back then in history.
*Civilization changed over time because we needed it to, Because we actually wanted it to. Through the years we worked hard as a slave just to feed our families, so basically civilization changed for such a good reason. Civilization changed for Us.
Answer:
Before World War I Germany was a prosperous country, with a gold-backed currency, ... The Weimar Republic was politically fragile.
<span>The Sugar Act was passed by Parliament on April 5, 1764, and it arrived in the colonies at a time of economic depression. A good part of the reason was that a significant portion of the colonial economy during the Seven Years War was involved with supplying food and supplies to the British Army. Colonials, however, especially those impacted directly as merchants and shippers, assumed that the highly visible new tax program was the major culprit. As protests against the Sugar Act developed, it was the economic impact rather than the constitutional issue of taxation without representation, that was the main focus for the Americans.</span>
