Huhhhhhhhh??????????¿¿¿????¿¿???
Compounding interest is interest on top of interest.
For example, say you put 100 bucks in the bank.
You get 10% interest compounded daily on that 100 bucks.
That means that you get 10% interest not only on those 100 bucks, but all the money you make after.
So your interest would go from 10% on 100 bucks, to 10% on 110 bucks and so forth.
I hope this helps and please press that ❤ under my reply, it really helps!
Answer:
Jones is liable to pay.
He is liable to pay to the tune of $1000. This may be negotiated however if it is not fair.
Explanation:
See the following points
- The question above is an example of Implied At-law contracts. (We will get to the definition of this in a bit).
- A contract is a legally binding agreement that recognises and governs the rights and duties of the parties to the agreement. A contract is legally enforceable because it meets the requirements and approval of<u> the Law</u>. From the above definition it is clear that two people may actually be engaging in a contract without knowing it.
- The law defines that a contract is.
- Contracts may be Express or Implied.
- Express contracts are simply contracts that are stated expressly, or openly, in either writing or orally, at the time of contract formation.
- Implied contracts are created when two or more parties have no written contract.
- There are two types of implied contracts:
- Implied In-Fact Contracts: these are contracts which create an obligation between the parties based on the facts of the situation. For example, assume your neighbor hires you to wash his car every Friday for the entire holidays. You wash your neighbor’s car for the first four weekends of the holidays and get paid on Friday morning each time. The fifth Friday you wash the car and when you arrive at your neighbor’s house for your pay, your neighbor refuses to pay you. The law will infer that there is a contract between you and your neighbor, even though you never put anything in writing. This is an implied in-fact contract.
2. The other type of Implied contract is that which is Implied At-Law
In the case between Jones and Smith, the law imposes a duty to perform a contract, and will enforce such a contract even against a person’s will, where the situation is such that without this legal intervention, one party would be <u>unfairly enriched</u> or advantaged by another party’s action.
- In the question above, Smith is a CPA. He is qualified in every respect to carry out Professional Tax services. His services may be relied upon with a great degree of confidence.
- If Jones had not filed those tax returns, he probably would have lost monies that should have accrued to him from the government.
This type of agreement is also considered a quasi-contract. A quasi-contract occurs where the law imposes an obligation upon the parties where in fact the parties did not intend to enter into a contract and made no promise to perform.
However, because one party would be unjustly enriched by another party’s action, the beneficiary of those actions must make restitution or pay fair value for the services provided, even though there was never any intention to enter into an agreement.
Cheers!
Answer:
The correct answer is option d.
Explanation:
An increase in the supply of a product will cause the supply curve to shift to the right. This rightward shift will cause the demand curve and supply curve to intersect at a lower price.
This will cause the quantity demanded of the product to increase and the price of the product to decrease.
A decrease in the supply will cause the quantity demanded to decrease and price to increase.
The effect of supply increase is indicated through the given figure.
Answer: $495,000 User “Parrain” is the person who solved this question
Explanation: ALL costs that went into the DIRECT acquisition of the asset as well as COSTS TO SET IT UP for use by the firm should be accounted for in the amount recorded. In this case that would mean that the cost price, the closing fees and the modification fees all need to be accounted in the final amount. That would be $400,000 + $35,000 + $60,000= $495,000$495,000 should be recorded as the building's cost.