Explanation:
Lower annual interest in real terms is a relief to customers because it can go across a monthly payment like in a product purchase with a credit card. A low annual fee is just one payment that can be a certain membership of which happens only on an annual basis.
Justify your response by describing how using bank debt to finance all or part of the building purchase would affect the company's weighted average cost of capital.
What is WACC?
The weighted average cost of capital (WACC), which includes common stock, preferred stock, bonds, and other types of debt, is the average after-tax cost of capital for a company. WACC is the typical interest rate a business anticipates paying to finance its assets. Because it expresses the return that both bondholders and shareholders require in order to provide the company with capital in a single value, the weighted average cost of capital is a popular method for calculating the required rate of return.
She mostly used her own money to launch the company, demonstrating that she started with equity rather than debt. She isn't starting out with a lot of debt, therefore the needed rate of return would be below the average. She may now concentrate on growing the business rather than making ongoing debt payments. Due to decreased investment, the total rate of return ought should be lower. To be able to market what they produce, all they truly needed was indeed a retail location. This was not there in their prior store facility, which doubled as their kitchen.
Because they truly lack any debt to begin with, Clark can utilize some bank debt. She can then experience failing(defaulting) on the loan she obtained. This would be primarily caused by her not having enough money to be able to pay down the debt effectively
To learn more about WACC, click on the link below –
brainly.com/question/28042295
#SPJ4
Answer:
carpet installers
Explanation:
I just literally took this trust me
A General Education Diploma
Answer:
A. Meta-conflict
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that in this scenario Jon and Ana's exchange is an example of a meta-conflict. This term refers to a disagreement or conflict about how exactly one should engage in a conflict. Which in this scenario both Ana and Jon are arguing that the other is approaching the conflict in the incorrect manner.
