1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
topjm [15]
3 years ago
12

Which are aspects of the US foreign policy during Theodore Roosevelt’s presidency? check all that apply.

History
2 answers:
Alika [10]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Stopping European powers from interfering in the western hemisphere

and

policing disputes in the western hemisphere

Explanation:

I think these are correct sorry if they aren't

Anit [1.1K]3 years ago
5 0

Answer: stopping european powers from interfering in the Western Hemisphere

Explanation: The Roosevelt Corollary stated that the United States would use force to protect their economic interests in Latin America. It showed that Roosevelt saw the U.S. as an international police power.

You might be interested in
What is the iran-contra scandal
MrMuchimi

The Iran–Contra Scandal (Persian: ماجرای ایران-کنترا‎, Spanish: caso Irán-Contra), also referred to as Irangate,[1] Contragate[2] or the Iran–Contra affair, was a political scandal in the United States that occurred during the second term of the Reagan Administration. Senior administration officials secretly facilitated the sale of arms to Iran, which was the subject of an arms embargo.[3] The administration hoped to use the proceeds of the arms sale to fund the Contras in Nicaragua. Under the Boland Amendment, further funding of the Contras by the government had been prohibited by Congress.


The official justification for the arms shipments was that they were part of an operation to free seven American hostages being held in Lebanon by Hezbollah, a paramilitary group with Iranian ties connected to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. The plan was for Israel to ship weapons to Iran, for the United States to resupply Israel, and for Israel to pay the United States. The Iranian recipients promised to do everything in their power to achieve the release of the hostages.[4][5] However, as documented by a congressional investigation, the first Reagan-sponsored secret arms sales to Iran began in 1981 before any of the American hostages had been taken in Lebanon. This fact ruled out the "arms for hostages" explanation by which the Reagan administration sought to excuse its behavior.[6]


The plan was later complicated in late 1985, when Lieutenant Colonel Oliver North of the National Security Council diverted a portion of the proceeds from the Iranian weapon sales to fund the Contras, a group of anti-Sandinista rebel fighters, in their struggle against the socialist government of Nicaragua.[4] While President Ronald Reagan was a vocal supporter of the Contra cause,[7] the evidence is disputed as to whether he personally authorized the diversion of funds to the Contras.[4][5][8] Handwritten notes taken by Defense Secretary Caspar Weinberger on 7 December 1985 indicate that Reagan was aware of potential hostage transfers with Iran, as well as the sale of Hawk and TOW missiles to "moderate elements" within that country.[9] Weinberger wrote that Reagan said "he could answer to charges of illegality but couldn't answer to the charge that 'big strong President Reagan passed up a chance to free the hostages.'"[9] After the weapon sales were revealed in November 1986, Reagan appeared on national television and stated that the weapons transfers had indeed occurred, but that the United States did not trade arms for hostages.[10] The investigation was impeded when large volumes of documents relating to the affair were destroyed or withheld from investigators by Reagan administration officials.[11] On 4 March 1987, Reagan made a further nationally televised address, taking full responsibility for the affair and stating that "what began as a strategic opening to Iran deteriorated, in its implementation, into trading arms for hostages".[12]


The affair was investigated by the U.S. Congress and by the three-person, Reagan-appointed Tower Commission. Neither investigation found evidence that President Reagan himself knew of the extent of the multiple programs.[4][5][8] In the end, fourteen administration officials were indicted, including then-Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger. Eleven convictions resulted, some of which were vacated on appeal.[13] The rest of those indicted or convicted were all pardoned in the final days of the presidency of George H. W. Bush, who had been Vice President at the time of the affair.[14] The Iran–Contra affair and the ensuing deception to protect senior administration officials (including President Reagan) has been cast as an example of post-truth politics.[15]

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What were the advantages of free trade and reciprocity to the colonies of British North America? What were the disadvantages?
shusha [124]

Answer:

<h3>GOOD LUCK ON YOUR TEST SORRY I CANT HELP</h3>

good luck tho

<h3>The Canadian–American Reciprocity Treaty of 1854, also known as the Elgin–Marcy Treaty, was a treaty between the United Kingdom and the United States that applied to British North America, including the Province of Canada, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island, and Newfoundland Colony. ... Attempts by the Liberal Party of Canada to revive free trade in 1911 led to a ...</h3>

NVM HEAR I FOUND IT

3 0
3 years ago
Why was their political and economic tension between the British and the French?
shusha [124]

Answer:

the British and the French in

an attempt to become as wealthy as possible

through trade with their colonies. Mercantilism

prevented colonies from trading with anyone except

their mother country

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
What are 10 distinguishing facts about the monarch?
Monica [59]

Answer:  

results for What are 10 distinguishing facts about the monarch

10 Incredible Monarch Butterfly Facts

They Have Slow Motion Clapping Wings. ...

In the USA, They Travel 3,000 miles, Every Year! ...

They Are Poisonous. ...

The Caterpillars Are Keen Eaters. ...

They Arrived in Australia in 1871. ...

Their Chrysalises Have Gold Studs. ...

The Caterpillars Eat Their Shed Skins. ...

They Are Fast Growers.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Would you judge the governments assimilation policies to have been a success or a failure why?
emmainna [20.7K]

Answer:

Failure because the government can not be trusted and controls everything

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Select all that apply.
    14·2 answers
  • What short and long term goals might president monroe have had in mind when he formulated the monroe doctrine in 1823?
    10·1 answer
  • Of the following men, which one believed that political liberty could best be preserved if the executive, legislative, and judic
    9·1 answer
  • Who controlled fort wagner on the day after the assault by the 54th massachusetts regiment?
    8·1 answer
  • Does the Bill of Rights Come at the beginning or the end of the document?
    14·1 answer
  • Why did Japan invade Manchuria in 1931?
    11·1 answer
  • The president is angered by a federal judge dicision in a case and fires him
    11·1 answer
  • Globalization has made the average person
    9·1 answer
  • The man's response indicates that he
    12·1 answer
  • True or false
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!