Answer:
1.The Boston Tea Party was a political protest that occurred on December 16, 1773, at Griffin's Wharf in Boston, Massachusetts.
2. The cause of the Boston Tea party is because of all of the new taxes made the American Colonists angry
3.As a result of the Boston Tea Party, the British shut down Boston Harbor until all of the 340 chests of British East India Company tea were paid for. This was implemented under the 1774 Intolerable Acts and known as the Boston Port Act.
4.This act, which came to be known as the Boston Tea Party, was important because it fueled the tension between Britain and America that ultimately led to the Revolutionary War, which started in 1775 and led to America winning its independence from Britain.
5.The Intolerable Acts were punitive laws passed by the British Parliament in 1774 after the Boston Tea Party. The laws were meant to punish the Massachusetts colonists for their defiance in the Tea Party protest in reaction to changes in taxation by the British Government.
Do the conclusion urself.
Explanation:
Hope this helps
Which statement best completes the timeline?
The Bolsheviks
establish a
communist
goverment in
Russia
Joseph Stalin
becomes
dictator of the
Soviet Union
The Soviet
Union and the
United States
are drawn into
the Cold War
The Soviet
Union falls
apart
?
A. The czar's soldiers kill Russian protestors during Bloody Sunday
B. Vladimir Lenin establishes the Russian Social Democratic Labour
Party
C. The Russian Orthodox Church rises to power in the Soviet Union.
D. Soviet forces help defeat Germany in World War Il.
:
Explanation:
Answer: Low self-monitoring trait is seen in Jason
Explanation:
Low self-monitor is the characteristic in which a person's internal believe or values tend to make a person behave certain in different situation. They do not considered social cues given to them in particular situation and do not care for their appearance while behaving with internal beliefs cue.
According to the question, Jason is low self monitoring as he is making offensives comments in party about people without thinking about his inappropriate behavior which made others upset due to his internal beliefs. He does not consider his surrounding of the party where he should be well behaved and polite with his words.
I think war is justifiable
- if there is an attack on one's territory: so when Germany attacked Poland in 1939, it was justified for Poland to lead a war against Germany
- if NOT leading a war would lead to more victims... so for example sometimes a war to stop a genocide is justifiable
The meaning of the quote is a leader works along side of his or her people. The man who wrote this quote was a Chinese Philosopher by the name of Laozi. The belief system belongs to Taoism due to the nature of the phrase and how they believe in leadership. This quote is quite agreeable because you can not be a good leader without seeing in the eyes of those you lead.
