Your answer would be B. Help in adapting. Hope this helps.
Answer:
The Octopus by Frank Norris ( C )
Explanation:
The octopus by Frank Norris dramatized the conflicts over land between the wheat farmers in the West ( San Joaquin valley )against the power monopolized southern and pacific railroad companies.
The dramatization by Frank Norris was expressed through the technique of literary naturalism when he wrote the novel. the conflicts were mainly over the used of lands belonging to the wheat farmers by the railroad companies for the construction and operation of the rail system transportation. The farmers wanted their land for the cultivation of wheat while the companies wanted the land for construction of rail lines .
Spain: In 1492 Christopher Columbus, an explorer sent from the Spain crown of Isabella and Ferdinand in search of gold. Columbus intended to sail to India but sailed by accident to the Caribbean and the Americas instead. Realizing his misnomer(wrong designation), he instead looking here in search of gold and silver as well as eventually to exploit natives. This is shown in the areas of el mina and the Potosí. The Columbian exchange is when diseases, was the widespread transfer of animals, plants, culture, human populations, communicable diseases, technology and ideas between the American and Afro-Eurasian hemispheres.
England: A voyage by John Cabot on behalf of English investors in 1497 failed to spark any great interest in the New World. England was divided in the 1500s by great religious turmoil so they escaped to the new world. When Henry VIII broke with the Catholic Church in 1533, decades of religious strife ensued. Finally, under Henry's daughter Elizabeth, the English were prepared to stake their claims.
France: Many French Huguenots came to the British colonies for the same reason. The French came to the Americas in search of a homeland for the French Huguenots(protestants). Because they were not free to profess their religion in France.
Dutch:<span> Most Dutch came to America simply because they calculated that the future promised more prosperity for them and their children in America than in Holland. The Dutch were ever "family, faith, and farming" advocates. And the Dutch — as opposed to the Puritans — enjoyed the materialistic and creature comforts in life that their hard-earned money bought.
</span>
This is false. Although subsidies and excise tax are indeed ways the government can influence the supply of goods, privatization is not. Quite the opposite, involvement in company business influences the supply of goods.
Muhammad left Mecca to live in Medina because <span>he feared for his life. </span>The answer to your question is B. I hope that this is the answer that you were looking for and it has helped you.
