Answer:
An increase in supply, all other things unchanged, will cause the equilibrium price to fall; quantity demanded will increase. A decrease in supply will cause the equilibrium price to rise; quantity demanded will decrease.
Answer:
Factors to consider:
1. Specialisation role
2. Complexity of sales process
3.Tenure
4.Geographical coverage
5. Sales Representative leadership
6. Support network
7. Internal Bureaucracy
8. Value add of managers
Factors not to consider;
1. Market share
2. Production process
3. Distribution process
4. Personal affiliation, race or religion
Explanation:
When considering a company's span of control, which simply means the number of junior staff a manager should manage, it is important to note factors relating to geographical coverage, a wide coverage can create difficulties in supervision to a manager. Consequently reducing the span of control.
Specialisation also help in ensuring the manager is an expert in the area he or she supervise. Experienced manager with good understanding of the tasks, good knowledge of the workers and good relationships with the workers, will be able to supervise more workers
The complexity of a sale process can affect a manager's supervision performance. if the sale process for example require an online payment to a final user who may not be physically available. Supervising such sales requires adequate training.
Other factors like; Tenure, Sales Representative leadership, Support network, Internal Bureaucracy, Value add of managers are paramount in determining span of control. However, market share, production process, distribution process and personal affiliation, race and religion should not affect the span of control.
Answer:
d. If the WACC is 9%, Project B's NPV will be higher than Project A's.
Explanation:
The internal rate of return is the return in which the NPV is zero i.e cash inflows equal to the initial investment
While the WACC refers to the cost of capital by considering the capital structure i.e cost of equity, cost of preferred stock and cost of debt by taking their weightage
Now if the WACC is 9% so project B NPV would be higher as compared to project A as we can see that project B IRR is greater than the project A IRR
Therefore option d is correct
In a split offering, we see that a) shares are issued from the corporation and sold by existing shareholders.
<h3>What is a split offering?</h3>
A split offering is a type of stock issuance that involves the issuing of new stock and existing stock that it is in the market already. This is why it is called a split offering - one side of the offering comes from the corporation, and the other comes from the existing shareholders.
With a split offering, the seller will be existing shareholders and not the company. This means that the corporation that issues the shares, will then cooperate with existing shareholders who will then be the ones to sell the shares.
Find out more on stock offerings at brainly.com/question/13049425.
#SPJ1
Answer:
The correct answer for option (a) is 7.17% and for option (b) is $48,546.69.
Explanation:
According to the scenario, the given data are as follows:
(a) Present value = $3,000
Future value = $6,000
Time period = 10 years
So, we can calculate the annual rate of return by using following formula:
Rate of return = (( FV ÷ PV)^1/t -1)
= (( $6,000 ÷ $3,000)^1/10 -1)
= (2)^0.1 - 1
= 1.07177346254 - 1
= .07177 or 7.17%
(b) Present value = $12,000
Rate of interest (r) = 15%
Time period = 10 year
So, we can calculate the Future value by using following formula:
FV = PV × ( 1+r)^t
= $12,000 × ( 1 + 15%)^10
= $12,000 × 4.04555773571
= $48,546.69
