Answer:
11.11%
Explanation:
Calculation for the common-size balance sheet value of inventory
First step is to find the Total assets
Using this formula
Total Assets=Net fixed assets +Current assets
Let plug in the formula
Total assets = $518 + 274 = $792
Second step is to find the Common -size value of inventory
Using this formula
Common -size value of inventory = Inventory/ Total assets
Let plug in the formula
Common-size value of inventory = $88/$792
= .1111, or 11.11%
Therefore the Common-size value of inventory will be 11.11%
Answer:
d. 37.80%
Explanation:
Calculation for what is the expected return on RicciCo
Using this formula
Expected return = Risk free rate + Beta *(Market return - Risk free rate)
Let plug in the formula
Expected return = 9 + 3.2*(18-9)
Expected return = 9 + 3.2*9
Expected return= 37.80%
Therefore the expected return on RicciCo will be
37.80%
Answer and Explanation:
The computation is shown below:
a.
The amount of the adjusting entry for bad debt expense should be
= $45,000 + $5,400
= $50,400
The journal entry should be
Bad Debt Expense Dr. 50,400
To Allowance for Doubtful Accounts Cr. 50,400
(Being the bad debt expense is recorded)
b.
Accounts Receivable 675,000
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts 45,000
Bad Debt Expense 50,400
c.
Accounts Receivable 675,000
Less: Allowance for Doubtful Accounts (45,000)
Net realizable value of accounts receivable 630,000
The ethical relativism principle represents that there is no means to identify between right and wrong in morality, while the moral relativism principle declares that there is no manner to differentiate between right and wrong in morality.
<h3>What is ethical and Moral relativism?</h3>
Morality is said to be relative to one's culture's norms, according to ethical relativism. To put it another way, the moral rules of the society in which a process is carried out decide whether it is proper or wrong.
A morally correct behavior in one civilization may be ethically incorrect in another. Acceptance of a fact-value gap has driven most kinds of ethical non-cognitivism, such as moral relativism.
Moral relativism, unlike ethical non-cognitivism, does not deny that moral assertions can be true; rather, it denies that they can be made true by an objective, transcultural moral order.
Therefore, the ethical and Moral relativism are the correct answers of the given problem.
Learn more about the morality, refer to:
brainly.com/question/13324831
#SPJ1