1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
svlad2 [7]
3 years ago
11

Hypothesize what lasting effects did the removal to reservations have on the various native Americans tribes,including the effor

ts of the u.s government to abolish their practice and beliefs?
History
2 answers:
scZoUnD [109]3 years ago
6 0

The removal of American Indian tribes from lands east of the Mississippi River to what is now the state of Oklahoma is one of the tragic episodes in American history. Early treaties signed by American agents and representatives of Indian tribes guaranteed peace and the integrity of Indian territories, primarily to assure that the lucrative fur trade would continue without interruption. American settlers' hunger for Indian land, however, led to violent conflict in many cases, and succeeding treaties generally compelled tribes to cede large areas to the United States government.


elixir [45]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The possible lasting effects the removal to reservations had on the various native American tribes may be positive after all.

Explanation:

The history of Indian removal from their lands is tragic and tainted with violence. The tribes had to go through a painful process when dealing with the British colonists that, according to the Manifest Destiny theory, believed it was their divine right to occupy those lands. However, we may hypothesize that these events only made their practice, beliefs and culture in general so much stronger because they were forced to stay united and resist. The saying "<em>what doesn't kill you makes you stronger</em>" may come in handy here since this is exatcly what could have happened to them. So even though many of them died, the ones who survived became so much stronger and determined to not let anyone, especially the British and their efforts to abolish their practice, put an end to their culture.

You might be interested in
Why did the federalist a have more support than the Antifederalists?
tigry1 [53]
<span>The Federalists were better organized than their opposition, and their experiences with Congress during the Revolutionary War showed that a weak central government could not be an effective one.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Aurangzeb was a man of his time, not ours? what does it mean
wlad13 [49]

Answer:

The statement means that all the achievements that Aurangzeb was able to achieve and the things ha had done was possible during his Era as a king but cannot be achievable now in our life time.

Explanation:

Aurangzeb was among the rulers to have completely settled Sharia law and Islamic economics all through the Indian subcontinent. He was a refined military pioneer whose standard has been the subject of commendation, however he has likewise been portrayed as the most disputable ruler in Indian history.

He was an outstanding expansionist; during his rule, the Mughal kingdom arrived at its most noteworthy degree, governing over practically the entirety of the Indian subcontinent. During his lifetime, triumphs in the south extended the Mughal Domain to 4 million square kilometers, and he managed over a populace assessed to be more than 158 million subjects, Under his rule, India outperformed Qing China to turn into the world's biggest economy and greatest assembling influence, worth almost a fourth of worldwide Gross domestic product and more than the total of Western Europe, and its biggest and most affluent region, the Bengal Subah, flagged the proto-industrialization.

Aurangzeb was noted for his strict devotion; he recited the whole Quran, considered hadiths and severely noticed the customs of Islam.

8 0
3 years ago
The best-known American band composer was A. Amy Cheney Beach. B. John Philip Sousa. C. Stephen Foster. D. William Billing
sveticcg [70]
B. John Philip Sousa
4 0
3 years ago
Why did the Soviet Union set up a number of satellites Communist nations along
Debora [2.8K]

Answer:

Stalin's main motive for the creation of Soviet satellite states in Eastern Europe was the need for security. When the war ended, the Soviet Union was the only Communist country in the world and Stalin believed that Western countries were bent on destroying it.

Explanation:

Hope it helps

FOLLOW my ACCOUNT PLS PLS

3 0
3 years ago
In both China and Japan, which group often wielded a large amount of power and control? a. … Read mor
adell [148]
China it is the most next jen eaven thoe japan made animae
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Early agrarian societies learned to harness water with _____.
    11·2 answers
  • Which had more power over taxation under the articles of confederation
    7·2 answers
  • What did the compromise of 1850 affect texas
    9·1 answer
  • What is one convention Plains women used when decorating ceremonial clothing?
    10·2 answers
  • What was the Estates General? Who was a part of it?
    13·1 answer
  • What did Woodrow Wilson hope to achieve with his fourteen points
    9·1 answer
  • Who was the 5 president?
    12·1 answer
  • Describe the case Nj vs. TLO case involving the search of a student.
    8·1 answer
  • Why do you think the Harlem Renaissance excited Hughes ?
    11·1 answer
  • Select the correct answer.
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!