Answer:
either-or fallacy
Explanation:
In the either or fallacy a situation is presented as the only alternative of another situation. But in fact there are other alternatives of a situation.
Here, according to Marty unless people get rid of guns they will have to face the same situation of gun violence that people faced in Kentucky, Arkansas, and Colorado. He has not considered what might happen if the guns are still present. There are countries where the existance of guns and violence is not related.
Hence, Marty is using the either-or fallacy.
Financial status impacts marital stability in many different ways. If a married couple struggles with financial worries there would be be blaming, worrying and shame in the family that can lead to many arguments. The husband or the wife may feel they are not doing enough to provide and to protect their families and may feel anxious as a result. If the main concern of a family is its financial survival, many other necessities may get neglected because of lack of money. The couple may feel tense and the tension may even contribute to the break up of the marriage.
Other factors associated with a couple's financial status are: health, education, recreational activities. The better the couple's financial status, the more healthier the family is, the better the education they can afford for their children and the better the cultural and social activities they can participate in.
It is always hard to say what the "initial" cause is- the initial cause
is always caused by something else. I'd say in this case that the
initial cause was the positioning of Soviet nuclean weapons on Cuba,
which was a very tangeable threat to the US. The noticing of these
weapons by the US marked the start of the Crisis.
But you should
also see the positioning of the weapons on Cuba in a wider context of
the Cold war. Specifically, Cuba felt threatened due to the Bay of Pigs
Invasion in 1961 ( a year earlier) and this caused Cuba to invite
Soviet weapons as a protection.
You are making a left turn from a two-way street into a one-way street, when you have completed the turn your car should complete the turn into the lane closest to the lane you have just left.
Turn off the lane closest to the direction you want to go and enter the lane closest to the one you came from. When turning, switch lanes as directly as possible without crossing lane boundaries or blocking traffic.
If there are no turn signs or lane markings, you should turn off the lane closest to your direction of travel and merge into the lane closest to your one-way street, the direction of travel This way you will cross the fewest lanes.
Learn more about a one-way street at
brainly.com/question/14330941
#SPJ4
Answer:
Compromises and Act.
Explanation:
The compromises and Act were related to the question of slavery. The South relied on agriculture and took the slavery system as legal to generate wealth. Whereas the North were against the practice of slavery they considered it evil because it bound people to their masters without having rights and freedom.
Missouri Compromise became the first compromise related to slavery. The Compromise established Missouri as a slave and Maine as a free state. The purpose of the compromise was to maintain the balance of power in the Senate.
The westward migration in California led the government to introduce the compromise of 1850. The Compromise of 1850 reduced the political dispute over slavery in new territories after the Mexican-American War.
The Kansas-Nebraska Act passed by the government in 1854. It allowed Kansas and Nebraska to decide whether to allow slavery or not.
