Hag-born" "whelp," not "honoured with human shape."
"Demi-devil."
"Poor credulous monster."
"Hag-seed."
"Strange fish."
These are just a few descriptions of Caliban, one of the most debated figures in all of Shakespeare. Is this cursing, would-be rapist and wannabe killer nothing but a monster? Or, is this belligerent, iambic pentameter-speaking slave worthy of our sympathy? Is Caliban a response toMontaigne's vision of the "noble savage"? Is he symbolic of the victims of colonial expansion?
Critical interpretations of Caliban are w
Possibly not, every persin thinks in different ways
From google:
savagely, cruel.
"he carried out barbaric acts in the name of war"
it is appropriate to break the rule that requires subjects joined by and to use a plural verb when either and neither are subjects. They always take singular verb.
For example :
Either of us is capable of doing the job
I am pretty sure it’s: the music is loud yet so confidential
