Less predictable
day-to-day
always changing
hope this helps!
Answer:
Customers
Explanation:
According to my research on Economics, I can say that based on the information provided within the question in this hypothetical situation, Customers are acting as an external force for change. These external forces refers to any factor outside a certain business or organization that will affect the business in one way or another, either for good or bad. In this scenario the customers not shopping at the store is an external force that is negatively affecting sales for the business.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
Rights and duties are closely related and cannot be separated from one another. Both go side by side. These are the two sides of the same coin. If the state gives the right to life to a citizen, it also imposes an obligation on him to not to expose his life to dangers, as well as to respect the life of others. If I have a right to work and earn, it is also my duty to recognize the same right of others.
Answer:
Explanation: Military education is valuable because it provide how much education did army trained anything with weapon
The correct answer is no.
Alisha was under no obligation to help Timmy, <em>there is no such thing like</em> <em>duty to rescue.</em> There is no legal requirement in the United States to help and rescue someone who is in danger. Even in extreme situation, when a person sees a person falling into a river for example, the witness of the situation is no obliged to assist with help.
There are some cases with some important exceptions: if the defendant created the peril he is obliged to come to the plaintiff's aid, if the defendant started to rescue the plaintiff, he must continue to do so, if the defendant is in a special relationship with the plaintiff ( teacher-student, worker-employer), he is under duty to rescue him.
Alisha was under no duty to inform Timmy's parents of the danger facing him <em>but she should have done it nevertheless.</em> She should at least have phoned them if she didn't have the time to stop by. She knew the boy well and she should have cared more. The need to help the boy should have come from her moral guidance and not as a sense of duty to be performed.
