I belive the answer is <span>To assert and maintain their rights
All the rights of American had been guaranteed since the creation of first 10 amendments of the constitution.
In order to preserve true democracy, we could say that it is our duty to </span>assert and maintain their rights so there is no-one could form a tyrannical rule in this country (not even the government itself)
<span>
if direct democracy means (pure) democracy then it means that every
citizen would get a chance to vote on issues instead of what we have in
the US: a representative democracy where we vote in politicians to do it
for us. A pure democracy would lead to civil war most likely b/c too
many people would be able to disagree, anarchy would be a likely
result,....so i would say D is your answer </span>
I am pretty sure it is parasitism because the tapeworm is hurting the stickleback
Answer: The "Scramble for Africa" between 1870 and 1900 ended with almost all of Africa being controlled by a small number of European states. Racing to secure as much land as possible while avoiding conflict amongst themselves, the partition of Africa was confirmed in the Berlin Agreement of 1885, with little regard to local differences. By 1905, control of almost all African soil was claimed by Western European governments
Explanation:
N/A
What was the whole question?
