Extreme abolitionists did more harm than good because they
tended towards extreme militancy, and with their use of virulent words, the extreme
abolitionists turned off Southerners to their cause. This did more harm than
good, first to the slaves, then also the abolition cause in general.
I believe the answer is: Social needs
Social needs refers to a form of necessities that could only be fulfilled with the help of other individuals. Social needs tend to affect our psychological health rather than our physical health, but if it is left unfulfilled for a long period of time, it could definitely lead to self destructive behaviour that harmful to our physical health.
Religious education is important because it equips students with cultural, social, moral and spiritual knowledge that aids in mental and physical development within society. The lessons learned in religious education prepare students for responsibilities, experiences and opportunities later in life.
The relationship between the level of religiosity and the level of education has been studied since the second half of the 20th century.
The parameters of the two components are diverse: the "level of religiosity" remains a concept which is difficult to differentiate scientifically, while the "level of education" is easier to compile, such as official data on this topic, because data on education is publicly accessible in many countries.
Different studies lead to contrasting conclusions regarding the relationship, depending on whether "religiosity" is measured by religious practices (attendance at places of worship, for example) or specific religious beliefs (belief in miracles, for example), with notable differences between nations. For example, one international study states that in some Western nations the intensity of beliefs decreases with education, but attendance and religious practice increases.[1] Other studies indicate that the religious have higher education than the non-religious.[2] Other studies find that the positive correlation with low or non religiosity and education has been reversed in the past few decades.[3][4]
In terms of university professors, one study concluded that in the US, the majority of professors, even at "elite" universities, were religious.[5]
Explanation:
The interactional model that says a political candidate's success depends on how their campaign message lines up with the voter's existing feelings is the Resonance model.
Explanation:
<u>Resonance is when the candidate's message lines up with the general consensus of the public about their wants in the campaign and how they understand their needs at a particular time. </u>
If the candidate's message lines up with the voter it is resonant with them and this interaction model is then said to be Resonance model. It has worked out for populist politicians many times if they are bale to catch what the public wants during the elections.
American colonists. Its easy really.
