Answer:
The middles colonies had rich farmland and a moderate climate. This made it a more suitable place to grow grain and livestock than New England. Their environment was ideal for small to large farms. ... The Southern colonies had fertile farmlands which contributed to the rise of cash crops such as rice, tobacco, and indigo.
if I am right then make me brainliest
The answer is c because Hooverts philosophy explains that he didn't want the government to be involved in any part of the depression; he believes that people will help each other instead of always depending on the government.
The correct answer is answer C ("The article will be biased because the historian is using only one source about the ruler").
If a historian only took this one scroll to write a biography on its subject (the ruler), it would most likely be extremely misleading and inaccurate. There's no way of getting closer to the truth of any subject without contrasting a variety of opinions from different sources. What if people working for this ruler wrote it in a way that made him look good? What if it was written under pressure? What if it was a complete lie? These and many other questions should come to mind as possible ways in which relying on one source might compromise historical facts.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
Western European nations controlled most of Africa. The United States had no imperial holdings. Japan and Russia
controlled most of East Asia.
France and Germany had colonies in Africa. The United States, Japan, and Russia had the fewest territories. Great Britain
controlled more territory than any other imperial nation.
Explanation: the sun never set on the british empire. japan and russia basically owned asia, and america had just started dipping their toes in "spreading their influence"
