Answer:
Correct answer is C. had a large amount of land suitable for farming.
Explanation:
A is not correct as most of the ports were located in the southern part of the Apennine Peninsula, which weren't always part of Rome.
B is not correct as Rome is surrounded by Mediterranean sea on almost all sides.
C is correct as agriculture was from beginning one of the main predispositions for the development of the country.
D is not correct as Rome was protected by the sea from three sides, and by the Alpes from the North.
Answer: Because it showed that change is possible
Explanation/context:
The medieval era had been one in which the Roman Catholic Church dominated the culture of Europe, and it was thought that no one could successfully challenge such a deeply ingrained institution. However, the Reformation movement by Martin Luther and other Protestant figures showed that even something as entrenched and enduring at the Catholic Church could be challenged, and changes could be accomplished. Even during Martin Luther's lifetime, this idea that change was possible motivated people to launch efforts toward other major changes to powerful systems. The Peasants Revolt that occurred in Germany in 1524-1525 took Luther's push for reform in the church and applied it to make a push for change in feudal society. Martin Luther himself didn't agree with that and opposed the Peasants Revolt, but as Schaff points out, the momentum of the Reformation was a "propelling force" inspiring other "forward movements" to make changes in society.
The fascist party leader who became dictator of Italy was named "Mussolini" and was the leader of Italy during World War II. Italy during this time was allied with Germany and Japan.
<span>The Ancient Egyptian civilisation owes its growth directly to the Nile river. This is because the Nile deposits silt from the river on the ‘black land’ every year when it floods, making it suitable for agriculture. Otherwise, the only land available is desert.</span>
<span>He called her editor and asked that she be taken off the story. Lay was trying to find a way to tamp down the negative press that Enron was receiving from its dubious accounting practices, and McLean's article was only fueling the fire against the company.</span>
