1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vladimir79 [104]
4 years ago
7

Which was the most important cash crop in the South in the 1800s?

History
2 answers:
jek_recluse [69]4 years ago
5 0
<span>tobacco, corn, cotton, indigo, sugar canes, wheat, and rice are all or most of the cash crops, but cotton was most likely the one that made the most profit because it could be used for beds, clothes, and many other things :)</span>
notsponge [240]4 years ago
5 0

COTTON is the answer


You might be interested in
Which Empire lasted only 100 years and which lasted 300 years
Charra [1.4K]

The Mongol Empire lasted only 100 years.

The Mali Empire lasted a little more than 300 years.
7 0
3 years ago
25 POINTS!!!!!!WILL GIVE BRANLIEST!!!SUPA EASY I JUST AINT SMART!!!! PLS COME TO AT LEAST LOOK!!!!25 POINTS!!!!!!WILL GIVE BRANL
Sphinxa [80]

Answer: 1. FRA’s RD&T mission is to ensure the safe, efficient, and reliable movement of people and goods by rail through basic and applied research, and development of innovations and solutions. Safety is DOT’s primary strategic goal and thus, the principal driver of FRA’s RD&T program. FRA’s RD&T program also contributes to other DOT strategic goals because safety-focused projects typically yield solutions toward state of good repair, economic competitiveness, and environmental sustainability goals. The RD&T program also has an important role to play in workforce development.

FRA’s RD&T program is founded on an understanding of safety risks in the industry. Hazard identification and risk analysis allows us to identify opportunities to reduce the likelihood of accidents and incidents, and to limit the consequences of hazardous events should they occur. Key strategies include stakeholder engagement and partnerships with other researchers such as the Association of American Railroads, prioritization of projects, and conducting research through cost-effective procurement.

1.Most large corporations today are beginning to invest aggressively in artificial intelligence (AI), the applications of which range from self-driving cars to virtual personal assistants, but governments have yet to jump on the bandwagon. In the public sphere as well as in policy circles, there has been much talk about the impact of AI on society (for example, what the future of work will look like), but there has been very little effort devoted to understanding how AI could transform government itself.

History is, however, replete with examples of new technologies or methodologies having fundamentally affected how government operates. Advances in technology can not only enhance or streamline administrative tasks and service delivery, they can also change the role of government or entirelyreorganise its core functions.

2.The technological and industrial history of the United States describes the United States' emergence as one of the most technologically advanced nations in the world. The availability of land and literate labor, the absence of a landed aristocracy, the prestige of entrepreneurship, the diversity of climate and large easily accessed upscale and literate markets all contributed to America's rapid industrialization. The availability of capital, development by the free market of navigable rivers and coastal waterways, as well as the abundance of natural resources facilitated the cheap extraction of energy all contributed to America's rapid industrialization. Fast transport by the very large railroad built in the mid-19th century, and the Interstate Highway System built in the late 20th century, enlarged the markets and reduced shipping and production costs. The legal system facilitated business operations and guaranteed contracts. Cut off from Europe by the embargo and the British blockade in the War of 1812 (1807–15), entrepreneurs opened factories in the Northeast that set the stage for rapid industrialization modeled on British innovations.

2.What pressures do American families experience in our new data-driven, tech-dependent society? Over the past forty years, information and communication technologies have transformed the way we work, the nature of learning and education, and the methods by which we achieve personal and collective goals. Parents, grandparents, children, and the range of loved ones who form part of the modern family today face new and challenging choices about technology use, access, and control. In this blog, Seeta Peña Gangadharan, Lisa Guernsey, and Greta Byrum capture the broad trends, helping to link questions about technology other social concerns and set the stage to reenvision social policy through the lens of the family. The piece is an excerpt of a newly published report released by New America’s program on Family-Centered Social Policy.

3.The steel highway improved the lives of millions of city dwellers. By the 1890s, the United States was becoming an urban nation, and railroads supplied cities and towns with food, fuel, building materials, and access to markets. The simple presence of railroads could bring a city economic prosperity.

3.Internet has the most influence on communities due to its interactive nature and wide usage. ... Internet, and computer-mediated communication supports and accelerates ways how people operate at the centers of partial, personal communities, and switching rapidly and frequently between different groups (Wellman, 1996).

6 0
4 years ago
In the myth of the "Self-Made Man", what did business tycoons claim their success was simply the result of? What was the actual
True [87]

Answer:

The Self-Made Myth exposes the false claim that business success is the result of heroic individual effort with little or no outside help. Brian Miller and Mike Lapham bust the myth and present profiles of business leaders who recognize the public investments and supports that made their success possible—including Warren Buffett, Ben Cohen of Ben and Jerry’s, New Belgium Brewing CEO Kim Jordan, and others. The book also thoroughly demolishes the claims of supposedly self-made individuals such as Donald Trump and Ross Perot. How we view the creation of wealth and individual success is critical because it shapes our choices on taxes, regulation, public investments in schools and infrastructure, CEO pay, and more. It takes a village to raise a business—it’s time to recognize that fact.

This book challenges a central myth that underlies today’s antigovernment rhetoric: that an individual’s success is the result of gumption and hard work alone. Miller and Lapham clearly show that personal success is closely tied to the supports society provides.

Explanation:

it’s worth mentioning briefly an additional impact that the self-made myth has on our public debates—that of people voting their aspirations. Because the rags-to-riches myth persists, many Americans hold on to the belief, however unlikely, that they too may one day become wealthy. This has at times led to people’s voting their aspirations rather than their reality. As Michael Moore noted in 2003:

After fleecing the American public and destroying the American Dream for most working people, how is it that, instead of being drawn and quartered and hung at dawn at the city gates, the rich got a big wet kiss from Congress in the form of a record tax break, and no one says a word? How can that be? I think it’s because we’re still addicted to the Horatio Alger fantasy drug. Despite all the damage and all the evidence to the contrary, the average American still wants to hang on to this belief that maybe, just maybe, he or she (mostly he) just might make it big after all.35

It is essential that we find a more honest and complete narrative of wealth creation. In chapter 2, we expose the fallacy of the self-made myth by examining the stories of individuals often lifted up as successes in our public dialogues. In examining their stories, we come to better understand that even their business success includes contributions from society, from government, from other individuals, and even luck.

Beyond the moralizing ridiculed by Twain, this individual success myth overlooked a number of key social and environmental factors. The emergence of a clear geography of opportunity showed that there was something about the place where one lived that contributed to one’s success. No matter what personal qualities someone had, if you lived in Appalachia or the South, your chances of ascending the ladder to great wealth were slim. Those who achieved great wealth were almost invariably from the bustling industrial cities of the Northeast. By one estimate, three out of four millionaires in the nineteenth century were from New England, New York, or Pennsylvania.7

Another unique external factor was the opportunity that existed at that time, thanks to expanding frontiers and seemingly unlimited natural resources. The United States was conquering and expropriating land from native people and distributing it to railroads, White homesteaders, and land barons. Most of the major Gilded Age fortunes were tied to cornering a market and exploiting natural resources such as minerals, oil, and timber. Even P. T. Barnum, the celebrated purveyor of individual success aphorisms, had to admit in Art of Money Getting that “in the United States, where we have more land than people, it is not at all difficult for persons in good health to make money.”8

He might have added that it also helped to be male, to be free rather than a slave, and to be White. While free Blacks had some rights in the North, they had little opportunity to achieve the rags-to-riches dream because of both informal and legal discrimination. Even after the Civil War, Blacks, Asians, and others were largely excluded from governmental programs like the Homestead Act that distributed an astounding 10 percent of all US lands—270 million acres—to 1.6 million primarily White homesteaders.9

5 0
3 years ago
The Romans used __________ in much of their architecture.
KiRa [710]

Answer:

arches

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What did Paul mean when he wrote, "For as often as you eat this bread and drink the cup, you proclaim the Lord's death till he c
ololo11 [35]
Jesus turned his body and blood into wine and bread. What he means is that whenever you receive the eucharist you are showing your belief in the lord, and will continue to do so until he returns.
6 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • The Gupta dynasty came to an end after
    11·1 answer
  • What was baron de montesquieu known for?
    9·2 answers
  • A "limited government" is a government that ?
    7·2 answers
  • How did elevated trains and subways improve urban transportation?
    11·2 answers
  • (True or False) Andrew Jackson believed that he had the right to replace federal workers with people who had supported him
    9·1 answer
  • 50 points =3 In Western Europe, the Church and local governments often competed for power. At various times during the Middle Ag
    11·1 answer
  • Montezuma be frightened and terrified of the Spaniards?
    10·2 answers
  • Noam Chomsky's Theory of Language Development
    12·1 answer
  • Someone help me I will make you brain
    9·1 answer
  • 3. True or False Can amendment can be proposed by a two-thirds vote in each house of Legislatures?​
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!