1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nordsb [41]
3 years ago
8

What was the primary purpose of the Sibley Commission in Georgia? To help schools across Georgia integrate peacefully To discove

r how Georgians felt about the issue of integration To lead non-violent protests To elect new civil rights leaders
History
2 answers:
klasskru [66]3 years ago
7 0

The Sibley Commission took place in Georgia in 1960. The primary aim of this commission was to dicover how Georgians felt about the issue of integration.

<em>Governor Ernest Vandiver Jr.</em> was forced to decide whether Georgia will apply the federal order of desegregation or will close their public schools. For this reason, he commanded to form the General Assembly Committee on Schools, also known as<em> Sibley Commision</em>. The committee was in charge or gathering the opinions and sentiments of state resident's about desegregation, in order to take a decision.

lesya [120]3 years ago
4 0

To see how Georgians felt about the issue of segregation.

You might be interested in
How were the rise of the middle class and the increased power of monarchs related?
tresset_1 [31]
As the middle class rises, the power that is being held by the monarchs started to decreases (because now the people do not need the help from the government to sustain their living)
To balance this, the monarch created several regulations to extract payment for the business and stricter regulations on societal issues, which increase the Monarch's power
4 0
4 years ago
In a brief essay, explain three ways in which the Roman Catholic Church responded to the spread of Protestantism in the sixteent
Veseljchak [2.6K]
<span>The Roman Catholic Church responded to the spread of Protestantism in the 16th century in a number of ways, intending to strengthen its own stance and its hold on church power. 
</span><span>
</span><span> 1. Religious orders were formed that aimed to build allegiance to Rome and the papacy, and to educate people in Catholic teaching.  The Society of Jesus, known as the Jesuits for short, was a key order of this sort.  The order was founded by Ignatius of Loyola in 1534, along with Francis Xavier and several others.
</span><span>
</span><span> 2.  The Council of Trent served to reform some abuses that were acknowledged by the Catholic Church. For instance, the Council of Trent put a stop to the selling of indulgenes. But more than anything, the meeting of Roman Catholic church leaders reasserted the full authority of Roman power and doctrine in opposition to the Protestant threat.  The Council of Trent held meetings over a span of years from 1545 to 1563.
</span><span>
</span><span>3.  The Roman Inquisition was founded in 1542 to act as an investigative body in regard to threats to Rome's teachings.  About a century later, Galileo would be one of the most famous persons tried by the Roman Inquisition. The efforts of the Roman Catholic Church in the 16tth century have continued to impact both Catholicism and Protestantism. Faithful Catholics see the "Catholic Reformation" (which included the items described above) as a healthy resurgence of Rome's spiritual authority. Protestants have tended to see Rome's efforts as oppressive, convincing them that breaking off relationships with Rome was the right thing to do. There have been some efforts in recent history to build ecumenical ties between Catholics and Protestants, but mostly the two sides have continued to pursue their separate missions apart from one another.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Can someone please like right me a thesis statement. so I have something to go off of. I've done this before and I failed it, ki
miss Akunina [59]
The Mayans, Incans, and Aztecs were advanced in regards to agriculture and architecture
5 0
3 years ago
What lessons did future U.S. leaders learn from the 1974 U.S. Supreme Court case United States v. Nixon? 1)The president is acco
BartSMP [9]

The correct answer is: The president is accountable for obeying the law

US v. Nixon stands for the rule that the President is responsible for obeying the law of the land.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What were the effects of this act on United States history? Native Americans were forced from their traditional lands onto reser
nikitadnepr [17]
In ways this created tension between the two parties. 
5 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did the southern cotton industry have a hard time recovering after the civil war
    12·1 answer
  • The United States decided to help South Korea mainly because of which of the following
    8·2 answers
  • The acronym M.A.D. stood for?
    15·1 answer
  • How were many Americans exposed to the ideas of the Federalists?
    7·1 answer
  • What two main religions emerged out of the split in the Christian Church?
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following best describes the lives of the native peoples under the encomienda system? A. They became rich, but coul
    12·2 answers
  • The United States formed NASA in 1958 to remove Soviet missiles from Cuba. oppose the building of the Berlin Wall. lead its own
    13·2 answers
  • What was the name given to the weapons transported to Kansas by Henry Beecher?
    7·2 answers
  • please help. Discuss the main consequence the Indian Wars had upon the Native Americans.
    11·1 answer
  • How did the stamp act serve as a cause of the american revolution?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!