ιт ωαѕ ¢αℓℓє∂ ραиgαєα αкα:ραиgєα
нσρє ι ¢συℓ∂ нєℓρ
Answer:
Kafka gives no indication as to what may have caused Gregor's transformation.
Explanation:
Although we can interpret what Gregor's transformation represents, we have no indication of what caused it, since the author left no factor expressed in the narrative, probably to stimulate our interpretation of Gregor's dehumanization in the midst of capitalism and the exploitation he went through. Gregor's family and himself, see transformation as a random occurrence, something of chance, as a disease.
Answer:
Aristotle.
Explanation:
In the Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle provided the first systematic study of ethics in the history of the Western world. This work is based on notes from his lectures at the Lyceum, consisting of ten books. Ethics, roughly described, is about good living given that it's aim is to create good living. Ethics should describe how one could best live. Aristotle continues the discussion about this subject that had previously started with Socrates and Plato.
Answer:
Communication and Trust Issues
Explanation:
<em>*If this a specific question with a specific answer then I have no clue.*</em>
Two of the many things that can lead to problems in a marriage is lack of communication and trust issues. If there isn't clear transparency of communication that can lead to misunderstanding and/or even divorce. <u>Communication is key to most relationships</u> and lack of communication can also affect other aspects of one's life. If a husband isn't communicating to his wife of what he needs or vice versa, then that could make for some pretty difficult arguments down the road. Trust issues can also affect a relationship very deeply. Trust issues are one of the things that can drive people apart. A lack of trust in a relationship and lead to resentment and frustration which can put a strain on one's mental state and marriage.
Answer:
B). Able to successfully sue the reporter for intrusion if the homeowner did not give the reporter permission to be in the house.
Explanation:
As per the given description, the homeowner would probably be 'able to sue the reporter successfully for intruding if the homeowner himself didn't allow the reporter to be present in the house' as the reporter entered the house without the permission of the home's owner but rather entered with the permission of the firefighters. Since the house belongs to the owner he/she possess the legal rights to sue any person for intrusion who has engulfed his/her house without prior permission. Therefore, <u>option B</u> is the correct answer.
