A deductive argument is one that the arguer wants to be deductively valid, that really is, to provide a guarantee that the conclusion is correct if the premises are correct.
This principle may alternatively be put as follows: in a deductive argument, the premises are designed to give such strong evidence for the conclusion that, if the premises are true, the conclusion cannot be wrong. A valid (deductively) argument is one in which the premises successfully ensure the conclusion. If a valid argument has true premises, it is also said to be sound. All arguments are either valid or invalid, and either sound or unsound; there is no such thing as being partially valid.
Therefore, the answer is deductive argument.
To know more about deductive argument click here:
brainly.com/question/1803030
#SPJ4
Contact, an electrical short, or dielectric breakdown can cause an electrostatic discharge, which is a sudden and momentary flow of electric current between two electrically charged objects. Static electricity discharge(ESD) can be generated by tribocharging or electrostatic induction.
The strap: When repairing electronic equipment, thisdevice grounds the user. It prevents electrostatic discharge (ESD) by directing static electricity away from the user and toward the ground. One end is typically wrapped around the wrist, while the other is attached to the frame of the device being worked on.
To know more about ESD, click here.
brainly.com/question/10800815
#SPJ4
Answer:
Fourteenth Amendment.
Explanation:
The Fourteenth Amendment to the constitution of the United States was approved on the 9th of July, 1868. The amendment addresses equal protection and citizenship rights. The amendment, especially its first section is usually used and has formed formed the basis for decisions like Roe v. Wade(1973) which was about abortion, Brown v. Board of Education (1954) which was as a result of racial segregation, Bush v. Gore(2000) which was about the presidential election. The amendment curtails actions of local and state officials.
Answer: Constitutional, unconstitutional.
Explanation:
In Grutter v. Bollinger, the Supreme Court of the United States judged that the student admissions process can constitutionally favor underrepresented minority groups as long as race is not the only factor considered.
Gratz v. Bollinger ruled a points-based admissions policy that granted bonus points to minority applicants, unconstitutional since it was breaking the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment.
