The answer is 6250 buddy.
You're welcome
-From Hockey
Answer:
Supply increases and price falls; Demand increases and price increases.
Explanation:
Other things remains the same,
If many Americans are selling their used cars, then this will lead to increase the supply of used cars in the market for used cars and shifts the supply curve rightwards. This shift in the supply curve will decrease the prices of used cars.
Now, Americans are buying new fuel-efficient hybrids which will increase the demand of hybrids in the market for hybrids and shifts the demand curve of hybrids rightwards. Therefore, this shift in the demand curve of hybrids will increase the prices of hybrids.
Note: Missing options are attached with the answer.
Answer: This statement is FALSE
Explanation:
Price Ceiling is the maximum price fixed by government , usually less than equilibrium price to make necessity goods affordable to max people.
Producer Surplus is the difference between prevailing price & minimum price needed to induce producers to supply . Diagramaticaly / Graphicaly , it is the vertical difference between supply curve & price level
Implying Ceiling Imposition , the price gets reduced . Assuming unchanged Supply curve , the difference between price & supply curve reduces .
Hence , Producer Surplus falls
Answer:
The answer is 7.37%
Explanation:
Solution
Given that
Bond per value = future value =$1000
The current price = $1,066.57
Time = 22 years * 2
=44 semi-annual periods
The year of maturity = 6.78%/2 = 3.39%
Thus
The coupon rate is computed by first calculating the amount of coupon payment.
So
By using a financial calculator, the coupon payment is calculated below:
FV= 1,000
PV= -1,066.57
n= 44
I/Y= 3.39
Now we press the PMT and CPT keys (function) to compute the payment (coupon)
What was obtained is 36.83 (value)
Thus
The annual coupon rate is: given as:
= $36.83*2/ $1,000
= $73.66/ $1,000
= 0.0737*1,00
=7.366% or 7.37%
Therefore 7.37% is the bond's coupon rate.
Answer:
A) No, in the presence of a negative externality, since the monopolist produces less than the competitive quantity, it may end up producing the socially efficient quantity. However, in the case of a positive externality, since a competitive market produces too little, a monopolist will only exacerbate the problem.
Explanation:
Monopolists produce less than the competitive quantity (marginal revenue = marginal cost) but charge a higher price for their products. In case a negative externality is produced, then the competitive quantity should decrease and the monopolist might end up producing the socially efficient quantity.
Given the same scenario where the monopolist produces less than competitive quantity, but a positive externality is produced, then the socially efficient quantity should increase, but the monopolist will not increase their output.