1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
marissa [1.9K]
3 years ago
15

In the 1974 case, __________, the Supreme Court ruled that even the President of the United States cannot withhold evidence from

an ongoing criminal investigation. A. Bush v. Gore B. United States v. Nixon C. Kennedy v. Nixon D. United States v. Reagan
History
2 answers:
Aloiza [94]3 years ago
4 0
<span>the answer is B. United States v. Nixon</span>
Radda [10]3 years ago
3 0
In the 1974 case, "United States v. Nixon", the Supreme Court ruled that even the President of the United States cannot withhold evidence from an ongoing criminal
investigation, since the US was trying to determine if Nixon had been behind the Watergate scandal
You might be interested in
What does the quote of "The capitalist system being discredited and destroys the world" means.
Gelneren [198K]

Answer:

How capitalism will destroy itself?

Marx's basic belief was that capitalism would destroy itself by creating the conditions wherein workers would no longer feel they had a stake in the game and so would revolt.

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Trees, sunlight, wind, and water are all considered to be
aivan3 [116]

Answer:

parts of nature

Explanation:

plz mark brainliest

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Plz help
Ghella [55]

Answer:

<h3>What is your opinion on it?</h3>

Explanation:

Once you tell me I will write it out so it fits your opinion

3 0
2 years ago
What is the main idea of this presidential proclamation?
kolezko [41]

Answer:

Its A

Explanation:

I did that Lol

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Investigate the Equal Rights Amendment on your own. Then, consider the factors that affect change, and explain two key reasons t
olganol [36]
1. After approval by Congress, it had a deadline for state ratification of seven years, and was considered a low priority amongst the turmoil of the 1970s.

<span>2. It was largely pointless. Every state already has some recognition of equal rights for the both sexes in its constitution or statutes, and a body of caselaw supporting the same. Many state legislatures were wary of ratifying an amendment that would expand federal power without really accomplishing anything.</span>
3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How has the Internet changed economic systems?
    9·2 answers
  • One piece of evidence that de Gante used in the excerpt to support his overall argument about the treatment of the people of Mex
    5·1 answer
  • The Gutenberg press was an influential development during the Renaissance and Reformation. In this task, you’ll analyze the exte
    9·2 answers
  • What did federal troops do at the Rock Falls settlement that made David Lewis Payne even more famous?
    8·2 answers
  • How man years did delorean spend in jail?
    7·1 answer
  • George Washington's Farewell Address, when and where was the source produced? What contemporaneous events might have effected th
    13·1 answer
  • Would You hace bien a Pioneer and migrated west? hey ir why not?<br>​
    6·1 answer
  • This is an excerpt from a letter written by a soldier fighting in World War I and
    13·1 answer
  • Help doing a quiz! and really need these points
    11·1 answer
  • Que efecto tienen loa océanos sobre los huracanes
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!