Best answer: A) Lists the powers given to the national government and the powers denied the states, and leaves all other powers to the states and the people.
These are called "reserved powers" -- powers reserved for the states and the people, which are any powers not specifically designated to the federal government in the United States Constitution. So, laws and policies concerning education within a state, or laws and policies regarding business, trade and industry in a state would be examples of "reserved powers" the states hold. Specific punishments for crimes committed within the states would also be an example. (Note, for instance, that some states have a death penalty for those convicted of murder, and other states do not have a death penalty.) Any laws and powers exercised by the states still must be in accord with what is stated in the US Constitution, however.
The idea of powers reserved to the states is stated in the 10th Amendment of the Constitution: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people." So the "reserved powers" of the states and people is a very broad category that could include many examples.
Answer:
New technologies aided farmers and cattlemen in places where standard fencing materials were scarce. ... Technological advances increased the speed of correspondence from months to weeks and then to minutes. Each technological advance further opened the West and helped bind the growing country together.
Explanation:
Mark me please
Indentured servants usually only worked for a certain period of time while slaves were lifelong unless they could buy their freedom. Slaves didn't require a pay after a certain time unlike the indentured servants did
Answer:
he testified. back then that could get you killed
Answer:
78 says but the US does have a severe problem with the concept.
The idea of separation of powers does not function well in today’s modern world with disciplined party members. In fact I would wager that the concept is mythical and unenforceable.
If the government of the UK can function in excellent manner without the concept then that is proof of it’s uselessness. The British government practices a concept called legislative supremacy where there’s no “separation”, no “checks”, and no “balances”. The government is totally run by the elected representatives who have the power to change anything at anytime without obstruction from the monarch, the Lords, or the courts.
The idea of an independent judiciary is another myth because the US political culture fights to the extreme for judges that are not independent but faithful to the proper ideology.
Explanation:
