She is incorrect cause if we take the number 20 and take 25% of it it equals 5 so now 20 is only 15. They if we take 75% away from 20 is equals 15 so then we only have 5 from 20 left. Therefore she’s incorrect because 75% leaves 5/20 and 25% leaves 15/20. Hope that makes sense.
The amount of George's income that is subject to withholding is <u>$75,000</u>, which excludes the alimony income.
<h3>What is alimony income?</h3>
Alimony income represents the amount received from a spouse or a former spouse under a divorce or separation instrument.
<h3>What are the incomes subject to withholding?</h3>
The incomes subject to withholding include the following:
- Regular
- Commissions
- Vacation pay
- Reimbursements
- Other expense allowances
- Pensions
- Bonuses
- Dividends
- Gambling winnings.
<h3>Data and Calculations:</h3>
Wages income = $50,000
Gambling winning = $20,000
Alimony income = $10,000
Dividend income = $5,000
Income subject to withholding = $75,000 ($20,000 + $20,000 + $5,000)
Thus, George's income that is subject to withholding is <u>$75,000</u>, excluding the alimony income.
Learn more about withholding tax at brainly.com/question/26781826
#SPJ1
Answer:
B. 1,188 cubic units
Step-by-step explanation:
First find the area of the base
A = 1/2b*h (this would only be half the base so our formula would be)
A = b*h (Now enter values)
A = (9)(6)
A = 54 (now plug this into the volume formula)
V = Ab * h
V = (54)(22)
V = 1,188 cubic units
Answer:
B
C
F
D
H
A
G
E
Step-by-step explanation:
Ok. They are trying to reconstruct the smaller looking triangle in the bigger triangle using angle A as the common angle.
The first statement is always the given.
Second they constructed line segment XY into the bigger triangle so that XY is parallel to BC.
Third, from the construction of the parallel lines we can now find corresponding angles that are congruent. This would be the use of F.
Since we have all three angles in triangle AXY and triangle ABC, then the construction of the smaller triangle we made inside the bigger triangle is similar to the bigger triangle. So we have the triangles are similar. You could say E or D here in my opinion. This is choice D.
Fifth the creation of those fractions of sides being equal comes from us knowing the corresponding sides of similar triangles are proportional. This is choice H.
Things looked cut off for the sixth thing so I can't fully read it, but it is possible a substitution has occured.
The seventh thing is a congruence statement which can be proven by a congruence postulate. The only one listed is SAS. So that is G.
The last thing, since the triangle construction is congruent to the smaller triangle then we know the smaller triangle is also similar to the bigger triangle since the bigger one is also similar to the construction we made. I really think E and D is interchangeable. Choice E goes here.
