Answer:
(I dont see the sections but Ill answer on what I know) Slavery was commonly practiced in the United States in the Southern Plantations since the people considered it to be cheaper then hiring people and paying them. That made the south a wealthy place and made the economy of USA flourish in the south. The other reason the Slavery was so popular was as servants who would be in the house and serve food for guests. Another example is that they used to baby sit the child that cannot be left alone. Overall slavery was a belief that the White man was superior thus to the black man or as they called the black people back then a Negro. Slavery was later made illegal by Abraham Lincoln shortly after the American Civil War in 1861.
Women's lives did not improve at all if anything they were worsened. Rich woman during the renaissance had very little say in anything and was taught to help their husband run a business and take care of him and the house. The poor woman had no say in anything they only had to choices at life, they could either be a housewife and take care of the kids and the house ore they had to become a nun. The poor woman could not be single or have any rights.
The role of women was very scarce. Women were supposed to be seen and not heard. Rarely seen at that. Women were to be prim and proper, the ideal women. Females were able to speak their minds but their thoughts and ideas were shaped by men. Mostly everything women did had input given by men. Women were controlled by her parents from the day she is born until the day she is married, then she would be handed directly to her husband so he could take over that role. In the time of the renaissance, women were considered to legally belong to their husbands. Women were supposed to be typical ‘housewives.'
Though women were inferior to men, women in different classes had different roles. Low-class women were expected to be housewives and take care of everything to do with the house. The expectation of working-class women was a little bit different. These women were expected to work for their husbands and help them run their business. They would work alongside their husbands and then go home and take care of the household. Upper-class women may have had servants and workers working for them but the women were still expected to take care of the household.
Women could not work by themselves. Neither could they live alone if they were not married. If a woman was single, she was made to move in with one of her male relatives or join a convent and become a nun. There was no other option at this time for women.
In conclusion in different classes of women, the only women that were allowed to express themselves were upper-class women, but not sufficiently. The existence of women was there but it was a marginal existence. Very rarely would a woman of less than upper class be seen or heard expressing herself. It was unheard of. When women did express themselves, what they would express was tainted by male influence.
this is the citation I already put it through citation machine Gender Roles of Women in the Renaissance, www2.cedarcrest.edu/academic/eng/lfletcher/shrew/acloud.htm#:~:text=Mostly%20everything%20women%20did%20had,legally%20belong%20to%20their%20husbands.
Explanation:
please make mine the brainleist answer so i can get 19 more points. thank you
Roosevelt believed it was within the power of Congress to change the size of the Supreme Court. Members of both parties viewed the legislation as an attempt to stack the court.
The 1994 Cairo conference was mainly based on population and
development of people. The three main goals on which there were general consensus
were:
<span><span>·
</span>Provide education for all and sundry. It was
decided that primary education should be available for all within 2015.</span><span><span>
</span>
Reduce the number of infant and child mortality
to a minimum. Within the year 2000 the mortality rate should be reduced to 50
to 70 deaths per thousand.</span><span><span>
</span>Reduce the rate of maternal mortality to as
minimum as possible. </span>
Hihi!
The impacts that glasnost and perestroika had on the Soviet was that the <span>Mikhail Gorbachev's policies of </span>glasnost<span> and </span>perestroika<span> had profound and unintended </span>effects<span> on the Soviet Union. In that matter, many historians suggest these reforms led directly to the fall of communism and the breakup of the Soviet Union! </span>
I hope I helped!
-Jailbaitasmr
