Answer:
Dana
Explanation:
According to my research on different bank responsibilities, I can say that based on the information provided within the question the bank is completely liable to Dana. This is because the bank has a responsibility to Dana since she is the one who signed to open the account, which in term is her. They must now let her know why they dishonored the check and provide a solution.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
Check the explanation
Explanation:
The Expressed accumulated value<em><u> (which is the overall sum an investment holds at present, which also includes the capital that was invested and the gain it has received to date. The accumulated value can also be referred to as an cash value.)</u></em> of this third annuity at the time of its last payment can be seen in the attached image below:
Answer:
- Melba's adjusted basis for the land at the Acquisition date is $625000
- Melba's adjusted basis for the land one year later is $645000
Explanation:
The adjusted basis for a property/land is the net cost of the property after adjusting for factors that might attract tax as related to the land
The adjusted basis for the land at the acquisition date is the net cost of the land at the acquisition date which will be ( $225000 + $400000 ) because that was the net cost of the Land at the date of acquisition before an agreement was later reached by Melba requiring him to pay $400000 plus an interest of 5%
Hence the adjusted basis for the land one year later will be
= ( $225000 + $400000 ) + 5% of $400000
= ( $625000 ) + $20000
= $645000
Answer:
See below
Explanation:
The computation of carrying value on the balance sheet of the ending inventory of finished goods under variable costing is seen below;
Before that, we have to determine the unit cost
Unit fixed manufacturing overhead = $120,400 ÷ 6,020 units = $20
Then, the difference will be;
= Unit fixed manufacturing overhead × change in inventory in units
= $20 × (6,020 units - $5,920)
= $20 × 100 units
= $2,000 less than absorption costing
Answer:
Thailand:
Opportunity cost of computers = 300/20 = 15 tons of rice
US:
Opportunity cost of computers = 800/100 = 8 tons of rice
US has a comparative advantage in production of computers
Absence of trade:
Thailand consumes 150 tons of rice, it can consume = (300 - 150)/30 x 2 = 10 computers
US consumes 50 computers, it can consume = 400 tons of rice
After trade :
10 computers exchanged for 120 tons of rice
Thailand continues to consume 150 tons of rice, it will consume = 12 computers (=10 + 30/15)
US continues to consume 50 computers, it will consume = 440 tons of rice (=120 + 40 x 8)
Both would accept the proposal as both are better off with trade
