Answer:
Post-1945 immigration to the United States differed fairly dramatically from America’s earlier 20th- and 19th-century immigration patterns, most notably in the dramatic rise in numbers of immigrants from Asia. Beginning in the late 19th century, the U.S. government took steps to bar immigration from Asia. The establishment of the national origins quota system in the 1924 Immigration Act narrowed the entryway for eastern and central Europeans, making western Europe the dominant source of immigrants. These policies shaped the racial and ethnic profile of the American population before 1945. Signs of change began to occur during and after World War II. The recruitment of temporary agricultural workers from Mexico led to an influx of Mexicans, and the repeal of Asian exclusion laws opened the door for Asian immigrants. Responding to complex international politics during the Cold War, the United States also formulated a series of refugee policies, admitting refugees from Europe, the western hemisphere, and later Southeast Asia. The movement of people to the United States increased drastically after 1965, when immigration reform ended the national origins quota system. The intricate and intriguing history of U.S. immigration after 1945 thus demonstrates how the United States related to a fast-changing world, its less restrictive immigration policies increasing the fluidity of the American population, with a substantial impact on American identity and domestic policy.
Explanation:
Answer:
Yes.
Explanation:
Yes, the nation achieve the goals that Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. set in his Letter from Birmingham Jail because the battle against racial segregation was fought in the courts, not the streets. There are many examples in which we can see that cases of racial segregation were settled in the courts not in the streets which shows that the nation achieve the goals of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
The answer is slave. The Antebellum Era, likewise roughly
denoted to as the Plantation era, was an era in
the past of the Southern United States, from the late 18th period up until the beginning
of the American Civil War in 1861, manifested by the economic development of
the South grounded on slave-driven plantation agribusiness. The revivalism that
spread thru the country throughout the antebellum era also contributed increase
to several social reform movements like abolitionism (sought to end
slavery).
I think the answer is diminishing marginal utility
<span> Big time cause it ultimately put up a claim that Slavery was technically legal in the whole Nation even if a State had an Anti-Slavery law because it was said that if a Slave fled to a Free State then he was automatically Free</span>
