Answer:
<h3>Have I not commanded you? Be strong and courageous. Do not be terrified; do not be discouraged, for the LORD your God will be with you wherever you go." "Go through the camp and tell the people, `Get your supplies ready.</h3>
Explanation:
<h3>I hope it's helpful for you</h3>
Based on the way things went over time, one can say that the popularity of Ali's stance increased positively.
<h3>What did Ali do?</h3>
- Muhammed Ali refused to fight with the American army during the Vietnam war after he was called up to serve.
- He claimed that because he was a Black Muslim, he was allowed to be a conscientious objector.
At the time he refused to serve, feelings of patriotism and anti-communism were at an all time high and so he was berated for his decision. Within the decade however, anti-war sentiment spread across the United States and led to Ali being praised for his decision.
Find out more on Muhammed Ali at brainly.com/question/10552420.
Explanation:
Development has contributed to financial prosperity and has ignited the obvious fate, and it has also led to sectional conflict over slaves. There were a lot of segregationists in the north whereas the south was predominantly pro-slavery, which created sectional friction since each person needs to see both values spread to the west.
The Civil War was not entirely caused by Lincoln's election, but the election was one of the primary reasons the war broke out the following year. Lincoln's decision to fight rather than to let the Southern states secede was not based on his feelings towards slavery.
HOPE THIS HELPED!!!! XD
Answer: The challenges of immigration are, more often than not, negotiated in the context of the family (Carranza 2001). Therefore, research in family studies needs to encompass the family as a unit of analysis as well as the patterns of resistance that family members develop in order to bounce back in an unwelcoming environment.
Explanation: A purposive sample was chosen in order to provide some diversity to the range of the accounts regarding mother–daughter negotiation. The purposive sample provided richness along many dimensions such as socio-economic-political religious affiliations, migration paths, etc. The sample design was fairly complex involving two sets of participants. Each of the two sets included mothers and their daughters. Participants in these sets were interviewed individually.These two sets were: (i) The Mother–Adolescent
Daughter Set which included Salvadorian immigrant mothers and at least one of their adolescent daughters between the ages of 15 and 17 years who were born in Canada or abroad; and (ii) The Mother–Adult Daughter Set which included Salvadorian immigrant mothers and at least one of their adult daughters between the ages of 19 and 30 years who grew up in Canada or arrived before becoming an adolescent. Mothers and daughters in these two groups were interviewed individually because ‘in-depth interviews provided the possibility to learn to see the world from the eyes of the person being interviewed’ (Ely 1991, p. 58). These in-depth conversations allowed obtaining information about the participants’ individual perceptions regarding their positioning as they settled into Canadian context.
To learn more about racism and immigration refer:-
brainly.com/question/8308669?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ2
