Laissez faire- government didn't regulate business nearly enough. Businesses could monopolize and jack up their prices. lack of government involvement is hurting america.
not too sure about business consolidates
big businesses becoming powerful- big business could swamp small businesses and raise their prices really high, but there would be no small businesses left for people to spend their money on a cheaper alternative
Answer:
1. the great society
2. domino theory
3. a book of law
4. 32 days
5. woodrow wilson
6. abraham Lincoln, for a device to lift boats over shoals
7. ronald reagan
8. lee harvey Oswald
9. herbert hoover ( hoover-ball)
10. John f Kennedy, he was 43
11. preident barack obama
12. abraham Lincoln
13. 456
14. 3 dogs
15. Jefferson davis and john Calhoun
16.freemasons
17.
Many whites wanted Indian land, and knew it would be easier to gain if the Indian tribes disappeared. With that statement appeared the Dawes Act, also known as the General Allotment Act, in February 1887. A scheme was soon developed for Indians that would allow individual Indians to own land for private use, and the Indians would be converted into capitalists.
These two river valleys were similar, because they both had a government form in hierarchy. They both had a ruler, and they were in the monarchy system. Some of the systems were considered to be well off systems because they were able to rule without disruptions and others had systems which were not in equality with men and women.
Answer:
I would say because they had no way to preserve them other than to pass them on to their kids, think about it I am certain most slave owners couldn't have care less about their slaves songs, they had no reason to preserve them.
