I believe the answer is: C. People in Latin America were angry at US actions.
All of those ideology was created as an effort to obtain foreign policies that beneficial with united states. Basically, those ideologies dictate that US shall never make a direct threat to obtain benefit in negotiation, but must always have military backers to appear strong an authoritative.
In the perspective of other countries' , such method of negotiation is perceived as an act of intimidation, which is why many people in Latin America were angry at united states.
This is known as the Anaconda Plan.
This military strategy, developed by Union General Winfield Scott, was meant to starve the Confederacy out of their resources. Essentially, Scott felt that if the Confederacy could not trade for goods with other countries they would not be able to survive. This is due to the Confederacy's reliance on cotton as their main cash crop.
This strategy helps to explain why the US wanted to blockade trade with other countries as well as why the Union wanted to control the Mississippi River, as they knew control of this waterway could negatively impact the Confederacy's ability to transport/obtain resources.
Thank you for posting your question here at brainly. I hope the answer will help you. Feel free to ask more questions.
The abolition movement has the least effect on late nineteenth century american industrialization.
The white abolitionist movement in the North was led by social reformers, especially William Lloyd Garrison<span>, founder of the American Anti-Slavery Society; writers such as John Greenleaf Whittier and </span>Harriet Beecher Stowe<span>.</span>
