1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vlad [161]
3 years ago
15

Why were Loyalists willing to support continued British rule but Patriots were not?. A. Loyalists believed the British governmen

t protected their rights, but Patriots disagreed. B. Loyalists usually had close personal ties to Great Britain, but Patriots did not. C. Patriots argued that citizens must give up freedoms to ensure security, but Loyalists disagreed. D. Patriots were well educated about political and economic ideas, but Loyalists were not.
History
2 answers:
patriot [66]3 years ago
7 0

A) Loyalists believed the British government protected their rights, but patriots disagreed

denis-greek [22]3 years ago
3 0
Loyalists are willing to support continued british rule but patriots were not because : A. Loyalists believed the british government protected their rights, but patriots disagreed

The patriots believed that obeying the british would undermine the potential that they could achieve. Meanwhile, most people who became a loyalists are the one that personally profited from british' rule

hope this helps
You might be interested in
How did immigrants adjust to their new lives in the Unite<br> States?
KatRina [158]
They had to learn a new language and get used to new customs and creating a familiar and comforting space
3 0
2 years ago
In response to the Supreme Court’s treatment of New Deal programs, President Roosevelt proposed the
forsale [732]

Answer:

c

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
What country in south america has the highest gdp?
ollegr [7]
South Carolina have the best gdp
3 0
3 years ago
Which of the following best describes the US government? A. Direct democracy B. Dictatorship C.Executive rule D.. Representative
mihalych1998 [28]
Representitave democracy
7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Bagaimanakah penyata razak 1956 mencapai perpaduan negara​
Valentin [98]

Laporan Razak merupakan tolak ansur di antara Laporan Barnes (digemari oleh orang Melayu) dan Laporan Fenn-Wu (digemari oleh orang Cina dan India) dan antara perkara penting yang dicadangkan adalah mewujudkan dua jenis sekolah rendah iaitu Sekolah Rendah Kebangsaan (SRK) dan Sekolah Rendah Jenis Kebangsaan (SRJK) serta menggunakan bahasa Melayu sebagai bahasa pengantar bagi SRK. Dahulunya, Laporan Barnes telah diserahkan kepada undang-undang sebagai Ordinan Pelajaran 1957. Apabila Laporan Razak mengetengahkan bahasa Melayu sebagai medium bahasa yang utama di dalam pengajaran, [perlu rujukan] ia juga membenarkan pengekalan dalam menggunakan medium bahasa yang lain di sekolah.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Mao Zedong and some of the survivors of the
    8·1 answer
  • Speculate on what you think might have happened if the truce had not ended
    15·1 answer
  • After being admitted into America, many immigrants in the 1800s made their assimilation easier by
    9·2 answers
  • What happened during the third great awakening?
    8·1 answer
  • Approximately how many Jewish people were killed during the Holocaust?
    10·1 answer
  • Please I really need help. (ww1)
    12·1 answer
  • Anyone can help me on this?
    12·1 answer
  • How were the rulers of the early West African empires able to control the trans-Saharan trade?
    15·1 answer
  • What is not the same as impeachment? *<br> Recall<br> Referendum<br> Candidate<br> Initiative
    10·1 answer
  • A group of scientists has tools to study earthquakes. But there are only enough tools for one location. The scientists have a ch
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!