I’m lying if I say I don’t want it
I can tell by your and your focus
Come on hop on this pony
Can I dive in your ocean♂️
Answer:
Tessa realizes halfway through camp that Varick's work is better than hers. Tessa adapts her plan when the museum rejects her request to film her final scene in that location. Tessa is jealous of Varick's work when she sees it. Tessa appreciates Varick's good influence when the instructors seem impressed by her film.
I believe a circular reasoning would be someone stating relevant reasoning of a topic for example for atheists do you believe in god the circular reasonings are all similar: god doesn't exist (because) there is no evidence to god (because) any evidence for god isn't evidence shaped like circular (circle of reasoning) Atheists have similar reasoning as they don't believe in god hope this helps :)
Answer:
I would say that the statement that is true is the one that says: <em>"Indirect messages do not cause miscommunication."</em>
Explanation:
I chose this statement because it is true that the fact that a message is indirect doesn't mean it is not clear for the receptor, the effective comprehension of the message will depend on the words choice of the speaker/writer and not on the kind of message he/she is using to express it. <u>About the other options</u>, it is true that a direct message allows you to express a desire without insulting or offending anyone, but it is also true that it doesn't depend on the message being direct or indirect, it only depends on the speaker being polite or not. The example "<em>Do my laundry</em>!" is actually an example of a direct message, it is written between quotation marks and it indicates that those are the exact words of the speaker, it is a direct message. About the last statement: the fact that the message being polite or not, doesn't depend on the kind of message, it depends on the speaker being polite or not, being kind or not. The most accurate answer is that the statement that is true is the third one: "<em>Indirect messages do not cause miscommunication.</em>", at least not necessarily.
