1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
slamgirl [31]
3 years ago
8

Which of the following statements best describes migration in the 20th century?

History
2 answers:
Mice21 [21]3 years ago
5 0

Options:

a. Large numbers of people moved to foreign colonies during the 20th century.

b. Migration during the 20th century was purely for economic opportunity.

c. Migration during the 20th century was influenced by several factors, including war and politics, urbanization, and economic opportunities.

d. Migration in the 20th century was influenced by European imperialism

Answer:

c. Migration during the 20th century was influenced by several factors, including war and politics, urbanization, and economic opportunities.

Explanation:

     Between the 16th century and the first decades of the 20th century, the main international migratory movement occurred from Europe to other regions of the globe, since European countries were largely responsible for the colonization of America, Africa and Asia. During the 20th century, the migratory flow started to be much greater in the opposite direction, leaving the underdeveloped countries to the developed countries of Europe and, mainly, to the United States and Canada, which have received many migrants from various parts of the world, even from Europe, or from poorer countries to neighboring countries that have more stable economies, in which case migrants take advantage of the fact that entry into these countries is facilitated by having less bureaucratic barriers and migrate in search of better living conditions.

    This change, in the migratory flow, was initially well received by the developed countries, since with the great economic and industrial development they needed cheap labor that was subject to exercise heavier tasks, but with the passage of time there was an intense mechanization in the production process, reducing the need for unqualified workers. As a result, many immigrants lost their jobs and started to contribute to the increase in social problems (unemployment, poverty, violence, etc.). To try to control the entry of migrants, and the problems caused by the large reserve of disqualified workers, several countries in the world (countries in Western Europe, United States, Canada and others) have tightened their policies related to migration, but these measures have not been effective because the number of migrants entering these countries illegally has increased and, because they do not have a visa, they cannot work in formal jobs. Other challenges caused by the migrations that developed countries need to deal with are the prejudice and intolerance that part of their population has towards migrants, since they are blamed for social problems and still have distinct cultural habits and manifestations, they are often the target of prejudice or intolerance.

Alla [95]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

facility for immigrants entering the United States in the late nineteenth- and early twentieth-centuries. Which of the following statements .

You might be interested in
What did people hear and see during the dust storm on Black Sunday? Give your answer in at least three sentences.
ss7ja [257]

During the Dust Bowl, people experienced dust storms which had a detrimental effect on the environment and their livelihoods. People could see mixture of soil erosion and winds caused the dust to fly freely and at high velocities. As a consequence, animals such as birds perished from the resulting suffocation and could be seen falling freely

7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Distinguishing power and authority: Some scholars have made a distinction between "power," the ability of a state to coerce its
olchik [2.2K]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although you forgot to include the document to have the complete reference, we can comment on the following general terms.

Power and authority are related in that both terms are used in politics and sometimes people use them as if they were the same but they are not. Yo as a ruler can have power but your authority can be questioned. Or sometimes, you can have authority but no such as a big power.

Ambitious rulers are greedy and they want more power to control, influence, and oppress people. They are in politics for the money. They are corrupt.

On the other hand, there are political leaders who really want to serve and improve the conditions of the citizens.

The key difference is that true politicians set the example. They have moral conduct and ethics. And they show it not only speak of it. In the case of ambitious and greedy politicians, they only speak and promise, but never deliver.

3 0
3 years ago
Why did Hitler go to a meeting of the German Workers Party (DAP) after the war
Semmy [17]

Answer:

On the orders of his army superiors, Hitler applied to join the party. Although Hitler initially wanted to form his own party, he claimed to have been convinced to join the DAP because it was small and he could eventually become its leader.

Source; Wikipedia

3 0
4 years ago
"We have been driven to the conclusion that only through legislation can any improvement be effected, and that that legislation
Andru [333]
Based on the excerpt, Emmeline Pankhurst is discussing how it is essential for women to gain the right to vote in order to improve their lives. Pankhurst makes the argument that legislation (aka laws) are what help to improve society. Since women could not vote as of this time, they had no ability to affect what laws were passed in society. This is why Pankhurst says that women should have the right to vote. If they truly want to change the world around them they must be able express their views and opinions.
4 0
4 years ago
How could the security of the U.S. depend on the survival of an ally?
bekas [8.4K]
No America (the US) is unusual in history. It's continent wide size, natural resources, and great distance from other continents means it doesn't have to rely on anyone. US allies, NATO, UN, etc. are just political conveniences, to promote US trade and world stability and peace.
If all US allies disappeared tomorrow, no one in the US would notice.
This 'has' happened before in history when the US practiced 'isolationism' and shut itself off from the rest of the world.
America's allies only benefit the allies and to some extent US business, America doesn't need the allies, but America does need world peace and stability....and that means allies.
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the main issue for why possible delegates didn't go to the Constitutional Convention? A. Arresting debtors B. Outlawing
    12·2 answers
  • Why did president jefferson want the louisiana territory explored
    12·2 answers
  • Where did funds for many private colleges come from?
    15·2 answers
  • What happened during the rain of terror in France?
    7·1 answer
  • Joan of Arc claimed to hear voices. Do you<br> believe her? Explain your answer.
    12·2 answers
  • Select the correct answer from each drop-down menu.
    11·2 answers
  • What were the effects of American investments in Latin America? Check all that apply. Latin America supplied cheap raw materials
    9·2 answers
  • Who holds patents awarded in the 1950s for automatic video scanning and inspection methods, which led to bar code technology?
    8·1 answer
  • The concerns of the nullification crisis were satisfied through a compromise suggested by
    11·1 answer
  • How did most Africans become enslaved?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!