Answer:
because germany setup a false jew camp with stores food and plays that they brought political powers to to show them that they weren't killing off jews
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:
Born from the wartime hysteria of World War II, the internment of Japanese Americans is considered by many to be one of the biggest civil rights violations in American history. Americans of Japanese ancestry, regardless of citizenship, were forced from their homes and into relocation centers known as internment camps. The fear that arose after Japan's attack on Pearl Harbor created severe anti-Japanese prejudice, which evolved into the widespread belief that Japanese people in America were a threat to national security. On February 19, 1942, President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed Executive Order 9066, giving the government the power to begin relocation.
Executive Order 9066 placed power in the hands of a newly formed War Relocation Authority, the WRA. This government agency was tasked with moving all Japanese Americans into internment camps all across the United States. The War Relocation Authority Collection(link is external) is filled with private reports explaining the importance of relocation and documenting the populations of different camps. WRA Report No. 5 on Community Analysis prepares the reader for the different ways and reasons for which the "evacuees" might try to resist, and how to handle these situations.
This order of internment was met with resistance. There were Japanese Americans who refused to move, allowing themselves to be tried and imprisoned with the goal of overturning Executive Order 9066 in court. The Japanese American Internment Camp Materials Collection(link is external) showcases the trials of Gordon Hirabayashi and Minoru Yasui, two men who had violated the relocation order. In the case of Japanese-American Gordon Hirabayashi, an entire defense committee was created to garner funding and defend him in court. The case made it all the way to the Supreme Court, where the President's orders were declared constitutional and Hirabayashi was pronounced guilty. Minoru Yasui v. The United States met the same fate, with the justification that Yasui had renounced his rights as a citizen when he disobeyed the orders of the state.
While many fought this Order in the court system, non-Japanese Americans found other ways to voice their dissent. Church Groups provided boxed lunches for Japanese people as they left for internment camps, but even this simple act of charity was met with contempt. Letters and postcards from the Reverend Wendell L. Miller Collection(link is external) admonished one group of churchwomen, exclaiming that they were traitors for helping "the heathen" rather than the American soldiers fighting for their country. >
<span>Mali and Songhai they seem share similarities in that they were both in West Africa, they both had power over some of the same cities (ie. Gao and others). </span>
<span>Answer:
The Founding Fathers drew vigorously from English logician John Locke in building up America's First Principles: the acknowledgment of unalienable rights, the Social Compact, and restricted government. Locke wrote a few progressive scholarly pieces, particularly "A few Thoughts Concerning Education," "A Letter Concerning Toleration," and "An Essay Concerning Human Understanding." His most prominent work which was powerful to the Founders were his First and Second Treatise of Civil Government (1689). Locke safeguarded the Glorious Revolution of 1688, in the Second Treatise, where he clarified that in a condition of nature individuals were allowed to seek after and shield there claim intrigues which caused war. To escape war, the general population built up governments to secure peace. To Locke "no flexibility" existed without a Social Compact of laws, since "freedom is to be free from limitation and brutality from others; which can't be the place there is no law." Unlike his English contemporary Thomas Hobbes, Locke contended that where governments secured the unalienable privileges of people; they had no power past that which was important to ensure those rights. The Declaration of Independence (1776) and the Constitution of the United States (1789) mirrors his considerations in which the pilgrims based their entitlement to end political bonds with Great Britain whose oppressive King and Parliament had held on in preventing the rights from claiming the homesteaders who were British subjects.</span>
Answer:
Kingship (rule by a single, male monarch) was the nearly exclusive form of government in the ancient Near East.
