In trying to make sense of FDR's domestic policies, historians and political scientists have referred to a "First New Deal," which lasted from 1933 to 1935, and a "Second New Deal," which stretched from 1935 to 1938. (Some scholars believe that a "Third New Deal" began in 1937 but never took root; the descriptor, likewise, has never gained significant currency.) These terms, it should be remembered, are the creations of scholars trying to impose order and organization on the Roosevelt administration's often chaotic, confusing, and contradictory attempts to combat the depression; Roosevelt himself never used them. The idea of a "first "and "second" New Deal is useful insofar as it reflects important shifts in the Roosevelt administration's approach to the nation's economic and social woes. But the boundaries between the first and second New Deals should be viewed as porous rather than concrete. In other words, significant continuities existed between the first and second New Deals that should not be overlooked.
Found this myself:
Which British policy convinced many American colonists to want to form their own country?
A. Great Britain separated the colonial governments into three branches.
B. Great Britain ignored the colonies during the French and Indian War.
C. Great Britain did not allow the colonists to participate in government.
D. Great Britain planned to sell several of the colonies to the French
The correct answer is C.
Answer:
D. He was given a leadership role by Jesus.
Explanation:
Answer:
Britain's debt from the French and Indian War led it to try to consolidate control over its colonies and raise revenue through direct taxation (e.g., Stamp Act, Townshend Acts, Tea Act, and Intolerable Acts), generating tensions between Great Britain and its North American colonies.
<span>One of the main thoughts was that it would have been best to place Germany under extreme economic pressure, which would have damaged the country more than if the Allies waged full-scale war against them. This was one of the major areas of disagreement because Clemenceau was wishing for these economic pressures, while Wilson wanted a more "peaceful" solution and George wanted punishments that would still allow Germany to thrive in the future and be able to help the rest of the European continent.</span>
