Answer:
Option B
Explanation:
Complete Question:
Both the Montgomery Bus Boycott and the Freedom Rides were successful in that they resulted in the integration of transportation. What was the difference in the way the successful outcomes were achieved
A. The Freedom Rides were successful despite having no central organization involved in the planning; the Montgomery Bus Boycott was supported by the NAACP.
B. The Freedom Rides succeeded due to federal intervention; the Montgomery Boycott succeeded due to local economic pressure.
C. The success of the Freedom Rides did not require the intervention of law enforcement; the Montgomery Bus Boycott involved local police.
D. The success of the Freedom Rides was due to the support of the American public, the success of the Montgomery Bus Boycott stemmed from international pressure.
The Montgomery Bus Boycott started due to Rosa Parks a black woman been arrested after she refused to give up her seat so that a white passenger could sit in it in Montgomery, Alabama. The Montgomery Bus Boycott was instigated against the policy of racial segregation on the public transit system of transportation. As a result of the boycott, Montgomery City Lines <u>suffered financially</u> by losing between 30,000 and 40,000 bus fares each day for a period of) 381 days(from December 5, 1955, to December 20. 1956, the bus boycott ended successfully after the Supreme Court upheld the district court's ruling that segregation on public buses and transportation was against the law.
The Freedom Rides was a political protest in 1961 by civil rights activists as a result of non-enforcement of the United States Supreme Court decisions which ruled that segregated public buses were unconstitutional. The ride was carried out by seven blacks and six whites left Washington, D.C into the segregated Southern United States which leads more than 400 volunteers who traveled towards the Southern United States after the first set of the freedom ride passengers were assaulted. The Riders were <u>successful in convincing the Federal Government</u> to enforce Supreme Court decisions.
hi here is your answer hope it helps or then sry
Explanation:
Improving living standards is not only a result of economic growth, but also an important factor in GDP growth. their satisfaction in work, consumption, social and political life. social welfare system and the social sector. reflects the living conditions, comforts and conditions
The correct answer is answer C ("To condemn the policies of this predecessor").
In 1956, Nikita S. Khrushchev (a very important figure for the Soviet Union) gave his infamous speech at a closed congress session of the Communist Party. His purpose was to destroy the figure of Stalin by denouncing the abuse of power from the dictator (criticizing his policies of wide-spread mass terror in detail) and also condemn is ineffectiveness at defending the Union from the German Invasion.
Hope this is helpful to you!
The correct answer should be<span> b.
Migration was high from Europe, and many people were concerned that
those sympathetic to Germany or its cause could be spies.
That's why they used to act to make it illegal to not support your government when it came to war efforts and international relations. They believed and feared that those who liked Germany would spread their support to other people and criticize inappropriately. </span>
It's historical fiction because takes place in b the past, the names are made up, and I don't know the last one
