1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
alexandr402 [8]
3 years ago
10

Why do you think lincoln proposed this proclamation? who did it affect? how? did it really free all the slaves?

History
1 answer:
OLEGan [10]3 years ago
4 0
Lincoln signed the Emancipation Proclamation on January 1 1863 as a means to follow up on his statement made in September of 1862. In this statement he threatened that any state rebelling against the Union and continued to do so would result in him freeing the slaves in their state. He followed up on this threat by signing this law.

Even though his intentions were good, this does not free any slaves. This is because the states rebelling against the Union do not seem themselves as American citizens who have to listen to the president. Rather, they see the Confederacy as a nation of its own, with its own laws and its own president (Jefferson Davis).
You might be interested in
Which country allows citizens to vote but only allows one political party to run for office?
zmey [24]
I believe it is A) Cuba
6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
even though the war was technically fought in north and south korea, which two major countries really did most of the fighting?
Alina [70]

Answer:

United States and the Soviet Union.

Explanation:

The Soviet Union was trying to spread communism all over Korea. The United States joined in with South Korea to fight against the communist North Korea.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How were chief black hawk and osceola,and what did they have in common
timurjin [86]
Hi lol<span> My Anser is .........................</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Assassination attempts, threats, and conspiracies surrounding Dr. King.
pishuonlain [190]

The claim of another shooter

In 1993, Jowers told ABC's Sam Donaldson that Ray didn't kill King and that he knew who was paid to do it. That account provoked a new round of questions about King's murder. But Jowers didn't want to say more unless the district attorney granted him immunity from prosecution.

James Earl Ray, ailing and serving a 99-year prison sentence, once again pushed for a way to re-open the case. And thus began another investigation.

Local prosecutors in Memphis, including John Campbell, were assigned to look at claims by Jowers and others.

"You know there was a lot of people that all of a sudden, yes, just came out of the woodwork," Campbell said.

Investigators went back and interviewed people who were at Jowers' bar and grill in 1968. Campbell's investigation concluded that many of those people failed to back him up.

One witness who was supporting Jowers decades after the killing allegedly told her sister that she was motivated by the prospect of money, in a call that was overheard by investigators. And Jowers himself changed his tune, from what he told the FBI at the time of the murder.

"Within a couple of weeks, we figured out this first story wasn't going to go anywhere, it wasn't true," Campbell said.

Something else was happening around that time — the launching of another investigation, this time, by the Justice Department under President Bill Clinton.

Veteran civil rights prosecutor Barry Kowalski, who worked on the federal case against the police who beat Rodney King in 1991, led that effort.

"We conducted a conscientious and a thorough investigation and just like the four official investigations before it, found no credible evidence or reliable evidence that Dr. King was killed by conspirators who framed James Earl Ray," Kowalski told NPR.

Justice Department prosecutors interviewed 200 witnesses and reviewed tens of thousands of documents. They found Jowers and the theory of a government directed conspiracy were not credible. And they wrote that they discounted other allegations, claims the murder was somehow linked to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.

Kowalski said that none of the subsequent theories or inquiries ever disproved the initial one: that Ray killed King, acting alone.

"I remain absolutely convinced that those well founded findings were correct," he said.

///

Of course you have to rephrase this is your own words because I literally just copied and pasted. Hope this gave you an idea of what to write.

3 0
3 years ago
Racial violence in the south in the late 1800 often included lynching which is another term for?
bearhunter [10]
Lynching is another term for death by being hung
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How was life the same for african-americans after the civil war?
    12·1 answer
  • How did the atlantic slave trade reflect the times during which it existed?
    10·1 answer
  • Which policy did Benjamin Harrison support during his presidential term
    14·2 answers
  • It is normal for the economy to go through cycles of expansion and recession. True Fals
    6·1 answer
  • Cyrus the Great is remembered for
    7·2 answers
  • ASAP!!
    5·2 answers
  • How did Golda Meir contribute to the development of an independent Israel?
    6·2 answers
  • Which colony was established to provide a barrier from Spanish Florida and was colonized by prisoners?
    13·2 answers
  • Q. What were the north's economic strengths
    11·1 answer
  • Explain why Europeans felt it was their duty to colonize African countries.
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!