If someone opposed the ratification of the constitution because it gave too much power to the national government what could they best be described as Antifederalists.
The establishment of a more strong federal government in the United States and the eventual ratification of the U.S. Constitution as it was adopted by the Constitutional Convention in 1787 were both opposed by a group of Americans known as the Anti-Federalists.
Since they associated British oppression with strong governments, many Anti-Federalists favored a limited central government. Others wished to promote democracy and feared that the wealthy would control a powerful government. They believed that the new federal government was receiving an excessive amount of power from the states.
The key anti-federalist leaders were George Mason, Melancton Smith, Patrick Henry, and James Winthrop.
The supporters of the Constitution and a stronger national republic were known as federalists. Anti-Federalists favored a small, localized government and opposed the ratification of the Constitution.
To know more about Anti-Federalists refer to: brainly.com/question/1939977
#SPJ1
Answer:
Nullification, in United States constitutional history, is a legal theory that a state has the right to nullify, or invalidate, any federal law which that state has deemed unconstitutional with respect to the United States Constitution (as opposed to the state's own constitution).
Explanation:
One result was that France gave up all its territories in North America, ending any military threat to the British colonies there.
The goal of Mikhail Gorbachev's policies of perestroika and glasnost was to
stimulate economic growth and political discussion