1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alja [10]
3 years ago
12

What does nullify mean and do you think states should be able to nullifg national laws? Why or why not?

History
1 answer:
Inessa05 [86]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Nullification, in United States constitutional history, is a legal theory that a state has the right to nullify, or invalidate, any federal law which that state has deemed unconstitutional with respect to the United States Constitution (as opposed to the state's own constitution).

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What were the driving forces behind the industrial revolution
GenaCL600 [577]
-Britain started it first both physically and politically.
-Large populations of potential workers
-water power and coal to power machines
-iron to make tools, machines, and factories
-river transport
-harbors to ship and sell products 

4 0
3 years ago
3) Who was Nixon referring to when he uses the term, "the silent majority?" 10
Nastasia [14]

Answer:

C

Explanation:

I dont really have an explanation but I am sure because I remember doing this once and it was a pain so here ya go

4 0
3 years ago
What factors helped the americans win the battle of yorktown
frez [133]
The factors that helped the Americans win the Battle of Yorktown were that the British were low on reinforcements and the Americans got assistance from the French. 
4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following statements is NOT true about the INTERSTATE COMMERCE ACT?
Sedaia [141]

Answer:

What are the statements?????????????

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Recently there has been major controversy over
slamgirl [31]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

You forgot to include the inscription to know what you are referring to.

However, doing some research we can comment on the following.

If the inscription refers to the Anderson Division of Hills Corps of the Florida Infantry, then our comment would be the following.

this inscription be

This inscription might be considered "controversial" by a number of Americans because it only refers to the 1st Florida Infantry Regiment that was formed by the Confederate state of Florida in times of the Civil War. Along with the 3rd Regiment, they fought in Tennesse as part of the battles fought in the American Civil War.

The inscription does not consider the black soldiers of the Union Army that were also killed in the battle site, so that is why people, in this tumultuous times of change, consider the inscription controversial.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • To which reform movement did Frederick Douglass devote his life?
    9·2 answers
  • Which of these is an apt description of the Scots-Irish?
    11·2 answers
  • How was American involvement in Vietnam an extension of the Truman doctrine ?
    6·1 answer
  • What was the indian national congress?<br><br> Any help will be appreciated thank you!
    10·1 answer
  • Which dynasties attempted to cut off trade with mongols
    10·1 answer
  • The Declaration of Independence made the feelings of the colonists toward the king and Parliament very clear.
    12·2 answers
  • ANSWER ASAP ILL GIVE BRAINLIEST!!
    14·1 answer
  • What can you use to test substances for their pH value if you don’t have a strip of litmus paper handy
    12·1 answer
  • Help need this asap. Thinking it might be D ( the last one)
    10·1 answer
  • Which crop has become a major part of Argentina's economy because
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!