1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Arada [10]
3 years ago
12

Help me please I need a lot of help

History
1 answer:
Genrish500 [490]3 years ago
5 0
It affects the U.S by helping the British to kill the army.
You might be interested in
Mention a few ways in which tribal people earn their livelihood
Alecsey [184]

Answer:

The main occupation of the tribal people was agriculture. But there were also hunter-gatherers or herders. Most often they combined these activities to make full use of the natural resources of the area in which they lived. Some tribes were nomadic moving from one place to another.Some tribal groups earned their livelihood by hunting animals and gathering forest produce. They saw the forests as essential for their survival. The Khonds were such a community living in the forests of Orissa. ... As a result, tribals often ended up taking high-interest loans from moneylenders.

Explanation:

<h2><em><u>I </u></em><em><u>hope</u></em><em><u> that</u></em><em><u> helps</u></em><em><u> you</u></em><em><u> and</u></em><em><u> please</u></em><em><u> mark</u></em><em><u> my</u></em><em><u> answer</u></em><em><u> as</u></em><em><u> the</u></em><em><u> brainliast</u></em><em><u> answer</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u>.</u></em></h2>
3 0
3 years ago
What description of medieval feudalism in Europe is<br> true?
ad-work [718]

Answer:.

..

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Who were the greeks and the romans
sashaice [31]
The Romans and Greeks are gods or dimigods maybe half-mortal and half-god
or even fule god


6 0
3 years ago
What was the result of the phalanx attack followed by cavalry charge at Gaugamela?
ruslelena [56]

Answer:

The end of the Peloponnesian War did not bring the promised “…beginning of freedom for all of Greece.”[1] Instead, Sparta provoked a series of wars which rearranged the system of alliances which had helped them win the long war against Athens. A peace conference between Sparta and Thebes in 371 ended badly and the Spartans promptly marched upon Thebes with an army of nine thousand hoplites and one thousand cavalry. Opposing them were six thousand Theban and allied hoplites and one thousand cavalry.[2]

Over generations, the Thebans had been increasing the depth of their phalanx, generally given pride of place on the right wing of coalition armies, from the traditional eight men, to sixteen, then twenty-five and even thirty-five ranks. As the Spartan and Theban armies maneuvered toward the plain of Leuctra, the brilliant Theban general Epaminondas devised a new tactic which would use the deep phalanx to destroy the myth of Spartan superiority.

Over the generations, the citizens of Thebes had developed a reputation as tough, unyielding fighters. Epaminondas had witnessed the power of the deep Theban phalanx at previous battles, and increased the depth of the phalanx to fifty ranks, but only eighty files wide. But Epaminondas’ true innovation was to position the deep Theban column not on the right, where it would have clashed with the Spartan’s weaker allies, but on the left, where it would attack the main phalanx of the Spartan “Peers” led by King Cleombrotus, arranged only twelve ranks deep. In other words, Epaminondas was concentrating his fighting power at the critical point in the evenly-spaced, less concentrated Spartan phalanx. Finally, he arranged the Theban’s allies on his right would advance “in echelon”, each poleis’ phalanx staying slightly to the rear of that to its left, so that the allied right would protect the Theban’s flank, but not initially engage with the enemy (see Leuctra map – ‘Initial Situation’). When asked why he positioned the Theban phalanx opposite the Spartan king, Epaminondas stated he would “crush…the head of the serpent”.[3]

3 0
3 years ago
How did these invasions contribute to the fall of the Roman Empire
notsponge [240]

Answer:

The most straightforward theory for Western Rome’s collapse pins the fall on a string of military losses sustained against outside forces. Rome had tangled with Germanic tribes for centuries, but by the 300s “barbarian” groups like the Goths had encroached beyond the Empire’s borders. The Romans weathered a Germanic uprising in the late fourth century, but in 410 the Visigoth King Alaric successfully sacked the city of Rome. The Empire spent the next several decades under constant threat before “the Eternal City” was raided again in 455, this time by the Vandals. Finally, in 476, the Germanic leader Odoacer staged a revolt and deposed the Emperor Romulus Augustulus. From then on, no Roman emperor would ever again rule from a post in Italy, leading many to cite 476 as the year the Western Empire suffered its deathblow.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the importance of the magna carta? select one:
    10·1 answer
  • WHAT BEST DESCRIBES THE TWO MAIN FUNCTIONS OF US GOVERNMENTS
    8·1 answer
  • African Americans contributed to the union war effort on the homefront by working as
    11·2 answers
  • Do you think ebor was important to us in America? why or why not​
    9·1 answer
  • Which country was dominated by the Qing Empire? Tibet Japan Siberia India
    5·1 answer
  • The Virginia Plan preferred representation based upon (5 points)
    5·1 answer
  • What effect or process is responsible for the higher temperatures that occur in urban areas? Heat island effect Hilt's Law Eutro
    13·1 answer
  • Answer plss!!!!!!!!!!​
    10·1 answer
  • 11. Which of these helps you understand what people are saying to you?
    12·2 answers
  • What took place when Diaz tried to enlist in the army
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!