Answer:
C. Under-capitalized
Explanation:
Tier Capital/Risk-weighted assets = (90 million + 70 million)/2,017.6 million
= 7.93%;
Tier 1 Capital /Risk-weighted assets = 90 million /2,017.6 million
= 4.46%;
Tier Capital/Total assets= (90 million + 70 million)/2,522 million
= 6.34%.
The first ratio puts the bank in the undercapitalized zone.
Answer:
The fair value of the assets of the identifiable assets of Thompson company are $38 million and the fair value of identifiable liabilities is $6 million. So if we were to find the value of Thompson company just on the basis of identifiable assets and identifiable liabilities we would subtract the identifiable liabilities from the identifiable assets.
38-6= $32 million.
This means that on the basis of Identifiable assets and identifiable liabilities the value of Thompson company is $32 million but they Anderson Company $ 30 million for the company which means that the company has a negative goodwill. The negative good will is the price paid - the fair value.
30 million - 32 million = -2 million
This means that Anderson Company will record -2 million as negative goodwill and this implies a bargain purchase which means Anderson company will record this 2 million as a gain on their income statement.
Explanation:
<span>A client/server network is an example of Central administration
In computer network, a central administration refers to something that enabled several computers to be connected under a single medium.
An example of The real life implication of a client/server net work is the system that we use for online multiplayer gaming</span>
It can mean that the bank is running low on liquidity of
cash. In the banks are required to keep a minimum of liquidity to be able to
give loans and keep the cash flow. In case the bank is running low on liquidity
the customer should inform the central bank and the central bank should fine
the bank for not maintaining the liquidity.
Answer:
Ball can certainly hold Sullivan to a contract for sale of the land. Sullivan in his reply to Ball's enquiry offered to sell the forty-acre tract of land at $60,000 and nothing less. Ball accepted this offer by Sullivan by stating his acceptance.
These exchanges of offer and acceptance meet the terms of a valid contract. Therefore, Ball can always hold Sullivan for contract enforcement.
Explanation:
In making a valid contract, offer and acceptance are key ingredients, with specific consideration. Since the two parties, Ball and Sullivan are agreed on the consideration and have exchanged offer and acceptance, the validity of the contract is enhanced thereupon.
