The answer is A because of 5q allowing it to be MC
Answer:
Whenever an accountant have some alternatives for reporting a transaction then there are some certain ethical issue for which an accountant must be aware;
1. is this method is permissible by the accounting standards?
2. Is this method permissible by the norms of the firm and industry?
3. Is this method violates ethical code of an accountant?
4. Is this method helps in maximizing overall welfare of stockholders?
5. Is this method helps in depicting true financial information to the stakeholders?
6. is this method really helps a firm in getting its objectives?
So before accepting any alternative an accountant should consider above mentioned points.
If alternative are successful on the above parameters then accountant can accept that alternative and in such case this alternative will not violate any ethical issue.
Explanation:
Answer:
<u><em>underapplied for 2.037.000</em></u>
Explanation:

we divide the expected overhead by the expected machine hours:
11,270,000 / 161,000 = $70
applied overhead = actual machine hours x rate
85,000 MH x $70 = 5,950,000
actual overhead 7,987,000
As we applied less than actual cost we underapplied the overhead.
7,987,000 - 5,950,000 = 2.037.000
Answer:
The best answer is "D"
Explanation:
Jessica will not prevail in her product liability suit under a theory of misrepresentation.
The key to recovery on the basis of misrepresentation is the plaintiff's ability to prove that he relied upon the representations that were made and for Jessica she is a little more the 200 pound mark.
Answer:
Explanation:
I am sorry but please give detailed question