1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mr Goodwill [35]
3 years ago
15

Paula caught a tarpon with a weight that was 10 times as great as the weight of a permit fish she caught. the total weight of th

e two fish was 132 pounds. how much did each fish weight
Mathematics
1 answer:
siniylev [52]3 years ago
8 0
The fish weighed 660 because 2÷132 is 66×10=660
You might be interested in
1. Thom has a scale model of his car. The
MariettaO [177]

x =\frac{4}{3}inch is the size in wheels on the scale model .

<u>Step-by-step explanation:</u>

Correct Question : Tom has a scale model of his car. The scale factor is 1 : 12. If the actual car has 16-inch wheels, what size are the wheels on the scale model?

We have , The scale factor is 1 : 12. We need to find If the actual car has 16-inch wheels, what size are the wheels on the scale model .Let's find out:

Ratio of size of wheels to actual size of wheels is 1:12 , but actual car has 16-inch wheels So ,

⇒ \frac{1}{12}  = \frac{x}{16}                 { x is size of wheel in scale model }

⇒ \frac{1(16)}{12}  = \frac{x}{16}(16)

⇒ x =\frac{16}{12}

⇒ x =\frac{4}{3}inch

Therefore , x =\frac{4}{3}inch is the size in wheels on the scale model .

5 0
3 years ago
The least-squares regression model y =−3.4+5.2x and correlation coefficient r=−0.66 were calculated for a set of bivariate data
Makovka662 [10]

Answer:

r=\frac{n(\sum xy)-(\sum x)(\sum y)}{\sqrt{[n\sum x^2 -(\sum x)^2][n\sum y^2 -(\sum y)^2]}}  

For this case the value of r = -0.66

Now we can calculate the determination coeffcient:

r^2 = (-0.66)^2 = 0.4356

And then we can conclude that 43.56% of the variation in y can be explained by the explanatory variable

And then 100-43.56 = 56.44 % of the variation in y that cannot be explained by the explanatory variable

Step-by-step explanation:

For this case we need to calculate the slope with the following formula:

m=\frac{S_{xy}}{S_{xx}}

Where:

S_{xy}=\sum_{i=1}^n x_i y_i -\frac{(\sum_{i=1}^n x_i)(\sum_{i=1}^n y_i)}{n}

S_{xx}=\sum_{i=1}^n x^2_i -\frac{(\sum_{i=1}^n x_i)^2}{n}

\bar x= \frac{\sum x_i}{n}

\bar y= \frac{\sum y_i}{n}

And we can find the intercept using this:

b=\bar y -m \bar x

And the model obtained for this case is:

y = -3.4 +5.2 x

The correlation coefficient is a "statistical measure that calculates the strength of the relationship between the relative movements of two variables". It's denoted by r and its always between -1 and 1.

And in order to calculate the correlation coefficient we can use this formula:  

r=\frac{n(\sum xy)-(\sum x)(\sum y)}{\sqrt{[n\sum x^2 -(\sum x)^2][n\sum y^2 -(\sum y)^2]}}  

For this case the value of r = -0.66

Now we can calculate the determination coeffcient:

r^2 = (-0.66)^2 = 0.4356

And then we can conclude that 43.56% of the variation in y can be explained by the explanatory variable

And then 100-43.56 = 56.44 % of the variation in y that cannot be explained by the explanatory variable

8 0
3 years ago
Pia printed two maps of a walking trail. The length of the trail on the first map is 8 cm. The length of the trail on the second
Vlada [557]
Scale :

Map 1 : Actual
1 cm   :  2 km
1 cm   :  200 000 cm          | Convert 2km to 200 000cm

Answer: The scale is 1 : 200 000 

Map 1 : Actual
1 cm   :  200 000 cm 
(x8)    :   (x8)
8 cm :  1 600 000cm

1 600 000 cm = 16 km

Answer: The length of the actual trail is 16 km

Map 1 : Map 2
8cm   :   6cm
1cm    :    0.75 cm

Answer : The scale is 1 : 0.75

Map 1 : Map 2
1    :  0.075 

3mm : 0.075 x 3 = 0.225mm

4mm : 0.075 x 4 = 0.3 mm

5mm : 0.075 x 5 = 0.375 mm

Answer: The side lengths are 0.225mm, 0.3 mm and 0.375 mm

3 0
3 years ago
I need answers please help me ​
shusha [124]

Answer:

the ansqer is g(x) = 4^x-4 + 2

4 0
1 year ago
Graph the function.<br><br> y=1+0.5x
Contact [7]

Good evening ,

___________________________________________________________

To graph such function we need only 2 points that their coordinates verify the equation y=1+0.5x then we link them with a line.

Look at the photo below for the graph.

:)

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Please hurry. showw all work
    13·1 answer
  • Give me a question that shows that you understand the relationship between ratios and rate.
    9·1 answer
  • Juan is debating whether or not to continue the recent lunch special promotion at his restaurant. The following graph shows the
    15·1 answer
  • In Ms.Khans class,22 out of 25 students hand in their projects on time. What percent of the class hand in their projects on time
    8·1 answer
  • What is the possibility of not rolling a 5 on a standard cube
    11·1 answer
  • An adult earthworm was measured to be 31.5 inches long. (Yes, they really can be that
    7·1 answer
  • Toby, Kate, and Jim had a challenge to see who could run the farthest in a month. Toby ran 12 miles. Kate ran 6 times as many mi
    7·1 answer
  • X+y=6
    7·1 answer
  • Hi, could someone solve this parametric system?
    10·1 answer
  • Need Help ASAP Will Mark Brainliest
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!