Answer:
Machiavelli claims that a leader must find a balance between a temperate and a cruel attitude to be successful. He makes a very effective argument. First, he uses deductive reasoning by stating a conclusion that he uses to prove his point. He says that if a leader is not cruel, his subjects will rebel and no one will obey the law. Second, his evidence is compelling. Machiavelli uses historical examples to support his ideas, which are clear and interesting to read. Finally, he uses sophisticated diction, creating a serious tone that provides a sense of authority. His reasoning, evidence, and diction all work together to support his claim, making his argument both horrifying and effective.
Explanation:
The Sherman anti trust acts reduced poet of monopolies
D) Niccolo Machiavelli and Baldassare Castiglione.
I just took the test.
Hope it helps
It would be "A. the French Revolution" that <span>prompted Washington's first diplomatic dilemma," since Washington was very much opposed to the US entering in to any conflicts overseas (since the US was still very "fragile"). </span>
