<span>satire: the combination of humor and criticism to point out human follies
</span> <span>It's so effective because it takes whatever it is criticizing to a point that you have to laugh and proves the truth of the criticism. Effective satire has to be based on "truth" - the characteristics satirized have to be there, exaggerated but there.
Example: "You might be from Wisconsin if you consider it a sport to gather your food by drilling through 38 inches of ice and sitting there all day hoping that the food will swim by."</span>
Answer:
B. She is able to draw on her experience and make the account more suspenseful and vivid.
Explanation:
Cox’s perspective makes the account of the arctic swim more suspenseful and vivid as she draw on her experience. Her personal experience gives readers a more enriching information about the artic swim. From the given excerpt, her first hand experience makes the account more clearer and well clarified for every reader. In fact, it creates suspense for readers and makes the readers looking out for what will happen next.
Stories are enriching if told by the person who had the first hand experience.
Answer:
B.
the answer is B because I looked it up on my old quizlet cards online
Answer: D. To portray an urban setting as a place of loneliness and isolation
Explanation: just took the test
Answer:
When the author says that our identities come together to “make us a house of flamethrowers/.”, I think he meant that humans are different and because of that difference there will always be conflict.
I think it also has something to do with instability because a flamethrower is erratic and not stable.
When the author said, "a river of living things", I think he was referring to how different people are and how our identities intersect.
A river can be a home to many different sea animals and no two sea animals are the same.
I think it can also mean that despite the differences, we still find a way to co-exist and move together as a society just like the river.
